Comcast and other ISPs objected to a requirement that ISPs “list all recurring monthly fees” including “all charges that providers impose at their discretion, i.e., charges not mandated by a government.” They complained that the rule will force them “to display the pass-through of fees imposed by federal, state, or local government agencies on the consumer broadband label.”

As we’ve previously written, ISPs could simplify billing and comply with the new broadband-labeling rules by including all costs in their advertised rates. That would give potential customers a clearer idea of how much they have to pay each month and save ISPs the trouble of listing every charge that they currently choose to break out separately.

Rejecting the broadband industry’s request, the FCC order yesterday said:

[W]e affirm our requirement that providers display all monthly fees with respect to broadband service on the label to provide consumers with clear and accurate information about the cost of their broadband service. We thus decline providers’ request that they not disclose those fees or that they instead display an “up to” price for certain fees they choose to pass through to consumers.

Specifically, “providers must itemize the fees they add to base monthly prices, including fees related to government programs they choose to ‘pass through’ to consumers, such as fees related to universal service or regulatory fees,” the FCC said.

The FCC was ordered by Congress to implement broadband-label rules. The FCC is requiring ISPs to display the labels to consumers at the point of sale and include information such as the monthly price, additional fees, introductory rates, data caps, charges for data overages, and performance metrics. The FCC rules aren’t in force yet because they are subject to a federal Office of Management and Budget (OMB) review under the US Paperwork Reduction Act.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    5910 months ago

    We’re scamming our customers so much, we can’t keep track of all the ways we’re doing it.

    • e_t_
      link
      fedilink
      710 months ago

      There’s a limit to how “mouthy” the FCC can be because one seat is still unoccupied. That means it’s 2:2 between Democrats and Republicans. Biden’s original nominee for the fifth seat was stonewalled by Republicans until she withdrew. His second nominee at least made it through committee, but the full Senate has not yet held a confirmation vote.

  • AutoTL;DRB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    610 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    The Federal Communications Commission yesterday rejected requests to eliminate an upcoming requirement that Internet service providers list all of their monthly fees.

    In June, Comcast told the FCC that the listing-every-fee rule “impose[s] significant administrative burdens and unnecessary complexity in complying with the broadband label requirements.”

    The five trade groups kept up the pressure earlier this month in a meeting with FCC officials and in a filing that complained that listing every fee is too hard.

    They complained that the rule will force them “to display the pass-through of fees imposed by federal, state, or local government agencies on the consumer broadband label.”

    That would give potential customers a clearer idea of how much they have to pay each month and save ISPs the trouble of listing every charge that they currently choose to break out separately.

    The FCC rules aren’t in force yet because they are subject to a federal Office of Management and Budget (OMB) review under the US Paperwork Reduction Act.


    The original article contains 503 words, the summary contains 164 words. Saved 67%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • HubertManne
    link
    fedilink
    310 months ago

    oh come on. We have so many of them and so many plans for more.

    • JesseoftheNorth
      link
      fedilink
      22
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      The FCC is a governmental regulatory body whose leaders are appointed by politicians. Plenty relevance to politics.

    • spaceghotiOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1210 months ago

      I’m sure they did, but I don’t know that it’s necessary. Corporations pushing back on government regulation and oversight relating to consumer protection isn’t inherently political?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        510 months ago

        I’m honestly struggling to understand how someone could interpret this post as not related to politics.

      • spez
        link
        fedilink
        English
        010 months ago

        yeah, I guess it does that way