Video surveillance footage showed three men attacking trans flags at the historic site during Pride month.


Officers with the New York Police Department arrested a Colorado man on Tuesday in connection with vandalizing multiple Pride flags at the Stonewall National Monument during Pride Month in June.

Patrick Murphy, 25, was charged with a hate crime and criminal mischief for the incident, which occurred just after 3 a.m. on Thursday, June 15, at the Stonewall National Monument in Christopher Park. Police say Murphy and two other men were captured on video removing and destroying several transgender flags that were part of a display featuring 60 different Pride flags hanging on a fence at the monument. Part of the fence was also destroyed in the attack.

NYPD officials told the Patch the two other men seen in the video have not been arrested.

It was the second time in three months that Pride flags were vandalized in Manhattan. In May, a man was arrested and charged with burglary, trespassing, and multiple hate crime counts for an incident at Buceo 95’s eatery on April 15. Police say Fred Innocent, 41, entered the eatery around 1 a.m., defecated on a Pride flag in front of patrons, then used a second Pride flag to wipe clean his backside.

Patch reported Innocent lives in supported housing for New York residents suffering from “serious mental illness” issues.

Christopher Park where the attack occurred is across the street from the location of the famed Stonewall Inn and the site of the 1969 Stonewall Riots. The Stonewall Inn and Christopher Park were designated national monuments in 2016.


  • Flying Squid
    link
    411 year ago

    Republicans won’t be happy until it’s open season on the streets for them to use their “second amendment rights” to hunt down every queer person they can.

      • @Madison420
        link
        141 year ago

        At this point you have to wonder why they’re so obsessed with drag and gay people.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          61 year ago

          Nah. They do it because they need a minority group they can point fingers at to distract people from actually scrutinizing their policy.

    • @Ensign_Crab
      link
      English
      131 year ago

      Be fair. They won’t be happy then either.

    • diprount_tomato
      link
      -261 year ago

      Sure sure, keep thinking that 3 people removing trans flags means half of the country will start mass killings

        • diprount_tomato
          link
          -211 year ago

          It reads more like isolated cases of assholes with probably more than one mental problem killing people than a genocide carried over by half of the country, if I’m being honest.

          It’s not something to underestimate, but it’s not as big as you claimed it to be

          • Flying Squid
            link
            251 year ago

            Sure, it’s always ‘isolated cases.’ It couldn’t possibly be influenced by all the anti-LGBT+ rhetoric in right-wing media.

            • diprount_tomato
              link
              -191 year ago

              Sure, the media is constantly saying “Kill as much LGBT people as you can”

              • Flying Squid
                link
                19
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                You do know that there’s such a thing as subtext, right? And when you start saying things like transwomen using women’s bathrooms are a threat to women, you are suggesting something should be done about it.

                • diprount_tomato
                  link
                  -18
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  And going from “something should be done” to killing people is a huge leap that few people have done, as the cases suggest

      • @Ensign_Crab
        link
        English
        51 year ago

        Sure, sure, keep pretending that you’re not happy this happened.

          • @Ensign_Crab
            link
            English
            51 year ago

            Based on your participation so far in this thread, it’s not like you hadn’t made it perfectly clear.

            • diprount_tomato
              link
              -51 year ago

              Sure, correcting extremists automatically means I want a group of people dead

              • norbert
                link
                fedilink
                61 year ago

                Running interference for a group that wants people to not exist automatically means you’re defending phobic assholes.

                • diprount_tomato
                  link
                  -51 year ago

                  “If you’re not with me you’re against me” fucking mentality

              • @Ensign_Crab
                link
                English
                1
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                I didn’t say you wanted them dead, just that you’re happy about the vandalism.

                But now I’m pretty sure you do, since you’ve volunteered the information.

                • diprount_tomato
                  link
                  -21 year ago

                  “volunteered the information” dude, shutting up an exaggerating dude isn’t “being happy about vandalism”

  • @Jerb322
    link
    101 year ago

    “What’s your name punk?”

    " Innocent "

    "Don’t give me that shit, I saw you do it! What’s your name? "

    "I swear I’m Innocent! "

  • @Staccato
    link
    41 year ago

    If you got issues with LGBTQ+ folks, you probably shouldn’t go to NYC to begin with.