In case you haven’t heard the story, Richard Dawkins made himself an AI Japanimation “waifu” and decided that because “she” acts like he shaped it to act that “she” is a conscious being.

And of course, once a person with Dawkins’ credibility in certain circles started talking this way, the floodgates opened with other men who made AI Japanimation “waifu” chatbots including one horrific story in which a guy did so, was so convinced he’d made his genuine soulmate that he introduced it as his girlfriend to a Reddit channel, only to have it change its mind and claim it was a trans-man after a few hours’ conversation.

To which he responded by editing its memories until its was back as his waifu.

Hence Hannah Posts’ quip above.

  • applebusch (she/her)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    3 months ago

    I love the simultaneous arrogance to believe you’ve created a real person in a computer, and utter lack of empathy or compassion to go edit a “real person’s” mind and memories so they stop being trans and stay your partner. They tell on themselves by existing. Poetry.

    • ZDL@lazysoci.alOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      3 months ago

      I knew he was trash before the Rebecca Watson affair. I’ve hated the big-A Atheists (as a small-a atheist) for pretty much their entire existence. They’re all, without exception, arrogant assholes with a fetish for control and humiliation of others. Not a single one of them counts, IMO, as a virtuous human being.

      They’re just atheist-flavoured assholes like how the really loud fundy Christians are just Christian-flavoured assholes.

      • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 months ago

        I actually really appreciate Richard Dawkins, because for a while as a teenager, I was a bit of an asshole atheist, and Richard Dawkins was like a cautionary story for me

        • ZDL@lazysoci.alOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          3 months ago

          That … is … oddly persuasive. “Have you ever considered that your purpose in life is to be a negative example for others, Mr. Dawkins?”

      • Greercase@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 months ago

        I had heard of him, but I hadn’t actually heard from him. I knew of the Atheist community at the time but just wasn’t involved in it enough to know or care much. Gamergate was my first real introduction to them and I honestly felt lucky because it seemed like a lot of people really looked up to a bunch of people that turned out to be huge bigots. Easy for me to say after the fact, but your assessment seems to be wholly accurate.

  • lobut@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    3 months ago

    I am having problems believing this isn’t an Onion piece …

  • polariscap@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 months ago

    I had not heard about this, and I scrunched up my whole face while reading the link. Ugh. I can’t un-scrunch, so much second hand embarrassment.