• Björn Tantau
    link
    fedilink
    English
    261 year ago

    Huh? Wasn’t that literally one of the original goals of Stadia. You’d watch someone play a game and you’d be able to launch the same game at the place where you paused the video.

    • @hightrix
      link
      English
      281 year ago

      Shhhh. You are supposed to have forgotten about Stadia.

      Now, here’s googles brand new tech! YouTubia!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 year ago

      Apparently this is focusing on more simple arcade/mobile style games, although that could just be for the trial period.

  • ivanafterall
    link
    fedilink
    15
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I can already feel this one starting toward the Google graveyard before it’s even launched.

  • AutoTL;DRB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    21 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Playables is a new technology from Google that allows you to play video games directly on YouTube.

    In June, information began to circulate indicating that Google was testing a new technology on YouTube that would allow video games to be played directly in the browser or in the mobile application.

    The information we have about Playables is very limited, although YouTube has shared more details about what they call “a new experience”; as they say on their official page, “Playables are games that can be played directly on YouTube both in the desktop version and on mobile devices.”

    Look for a new “Playables” area on YouTube alongside material on the home feed to see if you’re a part of the gaming trial.

    Of course, it seems that it will not have much to do with Stadia, the cloud gaming service closed at the beginning of the year, since the tests with employees consisted of arcade mini-games such as Stack Bounce or Brick Breaker.

    Perhaps they could simply be titles chosen for the technical test, but they could also be the type of games that one would want to offer on Playables.


    The original article contains 350 words, the summary contains 191 words. Saved 45%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!