The Interfaith Esperanto Committee strongly objected, or at least that’s what it sounded like, but nobody else speaks Esperanto so they might have just been upset that lunch was late.
Kial ne ambaŭ?
Saluton, kiel vi fartas?
Hmm, so “kialo” means something in Esperanto?
Yes, kialo is the reason for something to be. The cause, generally.
It’s the best language for debating religion, there is no question :)
It would have been inclusive to allow for Arabian, Greek, Latin and Hebrew. And it would have been epic to see an Arabic response to a Greek post citing a Latin quote.
Certe, frater meus in Christo.
deleted by creator
Latin used to be the number one language in the medieval catholic Europe for theological discussions, while Greek prevailed in what would become the orthodox part of Europe. Before the division, one could use both (although it was always easier to use Greek/Latin where it was more applicable). Needless to say, Latin was a scholarly language for a very long time, although there is no doubt that Hebrew would have it’s place too - but Latin was definitely more prevalent.
Lol I think this is my favorite sub protest yet
People keep coming up with smarter and smarter way to protest, I love it!
Spez flagitium hominis est
Bah. Just another Christianity-centric policy. What about the Zoroastrians?
Ok, for me this is the best protest I see in recent days
permitterent etiam hebraicum, sanscritum, arabicum, prakrit vel sereas classicas.
Quid est hoc, subreddit pro loquentibus?
