• PugJesus
    link
    fedilink
    161 year ago

    “For life in all its forms”

    … except fish, apparently?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    71 year ago

    For their brand of humor, this one is actually pretty funny (and blatant so it works in text).

    But it’s very probable that it will draw comments actually advocating for atrocities

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -2
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      God I hate that 40 IQ monkey

      Actually that’s an insult to monkeys, who are much more intelligent

      • JasSmith
        link
        fedilink
        -11 year ago

        There’s really something for everyone to hate. His faux socialism shtick doesn’t work so well while he whores himself out like the good little capitalist he is.

  • Draconic NEO
    link
    fedilink
    English
    41 year ago

    It’s almost like they’re trying on purpose to be as inflammatory as possible, I know they’re not and they’re 100% serious which makes it even crazier, I mean this is the kind of shit edge-lord teenagers say, just goes to show just how sad and immature these losers are.

  • aeternum
    link
    fedilink
    21 year ago

    cares about animal lives

    eats fish.

    Fish aren’t animals?

        • IWantToFuckSpez
          link
          fedilink
          101 year ago

          The same thing can be said about Japan. A lot more people died by the hands of the Japanese Empire during WW2 than those two nukes did.

                • PugJesus
                  link
                  fedilink
                  11 year ago

                  Agreed, not a good thing. Abu Ghraib ring any bells?

                  That’s not even fucking close.

                  but in the end the fact is that these “tactical nukes” weren’t used to take out parts of the command structure,

                  Hiroshima and Nagasaki were both chosen for their military and industrial importance.

          • @randomperson
            link
            English
            51 year ago

            Tankie brain doesn’t comprehend such stuff

          • 520
            link
            fedilink
            12
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Who the actual fuck was saying that?

            They were saying that compared to the damage the US has inflicted on other countries, including innocent civilian populations, the damage done by the 9/11 attacks is much smaller

    • HipPriest
      link
      fedilink
      51 year ago

      I don’t think you can really compare terrorist acts on a tit for tat basis. Two wrongs don’t make a right. The last 20 years has proved it didn’t really achieve much good for anyone ever, just a lot of bullshit.

      Like were the people who died in 9/11 directly responsible for the horrible shit their government did? No.

      Why was the attack not on a political building anyway?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 year ago

        The Pentagon is a government building. Everyone seems to focus on the towers and forgets American Airlines Flight 77.

        Regardless, the point of terrorism is to cause terror, not necessarily to kill people who “deserve” it.

        • HipPriest
          link
          fedilink
          31 year ago

          That’s true I did forget the Pentagon building because I’m an idiot

    • PugJesus
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      Oh, good, whataboutism for terrorist attacks by Saudi extremists on unambiguous civilian targets. Guess this is left praxis now.