cross-posted from: https://piefed.ca/c/privacy/p/796754/the-uk-s-teen-social-media-ban-is-political-theater-not-child-safety-policy
Indeed, the evidence has long suggested that these kinds of bans actually can make things worse by isolating kids who are at most at risk and who need support. At a time when fear mongering and moral panics have cut off basically everywhere that kids can be kids with each other and without adults hovering over them at every moment, social media became that kind of digital third space. Social media didn’t become the default digital third space because it’s uniquely ‘addictive’ — it became the default because adults have spent decades overreacting and shutting down every other place kids could gather and communicate without supervision.
The articles regarding those “underage social media bans” do have the right idea about the damage they are doing, but they completely ignore the real reason why those “child-protective measures” are pushed. It’s not age-verification, its identity-verification, and therefore even worse than even the most damning article they wrote.
Authority-Theatre.
call it what it is.
( so are the winners of the Big Brother Awards, btw )
🙏




