God dammit. This is pretty funny.
Forgiveness can be great in certain circumstances, but it has to come from the victims, not from the perpetrators, enablers and benefactors of the violence (Democrats).
Lmao remember when this was funny because the ease at which the blond lady dismissed things she didn’t care about was indication that she was not the progressive person she claimed to be?

Well I really don’t get it, analysing the past behaviour of the mistakes nature made, also called Usians, a sexual abuser has a higher chance of winning elections no? The problem is that he didn’t abuse a minor? I’m confused.
Wow this is so ruthless thank you for blessing me with the opportunity to experience this comment
USA is threatening military action in my country so I’m already pumping my hatred. In the end of the year I’ll look like Palpatine.
USA is threatening military action in my country
The sad part is that this doesn’t even narrow down which country you live in…
In the past was easier, there’s a info graph to follow:

everything not colored.Nowadays the colored ones could be the answer too.
I’m sorry about the cortisol, comrade. I hope the empire falls before they do more damage.
Thats only true if they take the time to thank Jesus for helping them rape children.
guys, raping, war crimes, nazi tattoos… are only bad when they do it…
Liberals are just as spineless as conservatives. they treat politics as a sport.
Damn, my bad. I thought she had a darker skin. In my defense, it’s kind of hard to tell in a back alley with no lights. /s
Alright, I’ll bite. Is there any proof he killed brown children?
He participated in the Fallujah and Ramadi massacares and was a concentration camp guard at Abu Graib and joined Blackwater.
Why don’t you ask for proof of him raping that white woman?
I see he was deployed at those times (not that he participated necessarily), don’t see anything about Abu Graib, and yes obviously he joined Blackwater. That doesn’t mean those things aren’t true obviously.
The woman did provide proof.
I just want to know what’s real and not the worst possible made up scenario.
don’t see anything about Abu Graib,
Did you try like, opening Google?
Yes? I wasn’t super thorough so I could be wrong.
Platner went to the United States Marine Corps School of Infantry and deployed to Iraq in 2005. “It was a relatively calm deployment for the first few months, mostly because the Battle of Fallujah just happened, and much of the insurgent activity in the area had been crushed in that fight,” he told me. Later, while he was on patrol at Abu Ghraib, there was an attack on the prison.
The woman provided recipts.
Did she provide video evidence?
Are you sure the video wasn’t AI?
Come on just keep doubling down like you’ve been doing for his war crimes against brown children.
I am not aware of any specific war crimes he participated in. I mistakenly gave him the benefit of the doubt and assumed he had grown from the kind of uncritical person who joins the military, hence leaving it and running on anti-imperialist policy.
But the rape was in 2023.
This was him in 2020.

The rape was in 2023. It’s 2026 now. Like who cares, the past is the past. He has grown past it right? He also said people need to respect women during his campaign and rape is bad. Why won’t you accept his personal growth?!
The Democratic Party people are so brain dead.
The dude was using a makeshift mortar to fire at densely populated urban areas even though using mortars where forbidden because the amount of civilians that got murdered was to high even for the us army standards. At the absolute provable minimum he risked children getting killed or injured even after ordered not to do so
Reading it, it seems more careless and stupid rather than malicious. But, I still didn’t know this before and I appreciate it.
How many levels of racist do you have to be to think shelling civilian areas with explosives is “stupid rather than malicious”?
If someone started firing grenade launchers into Maine would that be “stupid rather than malicious”?
He said he was firing at enemy mortar positions. You know, people shooting at them. They shouldn’t be there obviously but it’s a little different don’t you think?
Do you know how US military speak works?
So he tells this elaborate story only to leave out the one detail that he actually was doing it for fun and to kill civilians?
He posted on Reddit about how epic and fun it was. And how it was entirely inaccurate and he doesn’t know what it hit.
Ok so you get the order from higher ups that shelling this area is forbidden because it is too population dense. You then jerry-rig a kind-of mortar using a grenade launcher in order to explicitly defy this command without getting detected. You note that “it [is]n’t the most accurate system and [have] no idea if you ever killed an enemy mortar crew with it”, but sadly your training was insufficient to know that you would be putting childrens lives and limbs at undue risk?? And your reaction is basically 🤷???
Here’s a thought experiment: an american community starts to fight back against ICE with armed resistance. One of the ICE agents does the same thing, but years later decides to run as a dem candidate. What (if anything) does he have to do in order for you vote for him?
If afterwards he says he shouldn’t have been there and done that, is anti Israel, and his opponents are pro Israel and in the case of Susan Collins literally voted to send his ass and all the other thousands of troops there… Yeah probably. (edit: I guess for your hypothetical they would be a senator and primary challenger that’s pro ICE and the sitting senator is a rubber stamp for ICE funding increases and/or voted to create ICE)
My reaction is he wasn’t killing civilians for his own kicks and implies he’s exactly what I said, a stupid crayon eater.
If you went on top of the empire State building and threw multiple hand grenades on the street below, where white people could be walking, would you call that malicious? Or a terror attack? Can you see how him shelling a neighborhood where brown people live is similar? I’m not trying to be mean, but anyone who struggles to see how bad this is, might just have their ability to emphasize impaired by racism. It might not be their fault, people often absorb racists believes unconsciously or have a hard time extending the same amount of empathy, they would to white people to racialized people, if they rarely interact with them. People reading this, who suspect this might apply to them even in a limited way, should really take this to heart and try to reflect on their racist biases and ability to empathize.
He said he was firing at enemy mortar positions. You know, people shooting at them. They shouldn’t be there obviously but it’s a little different don’t you think?
deleted by creator







