gro24h.com rovum.net kardvin.com triplextrust.com kepadex.com gro52l.com buybtr.shop buy0g.shop buysahara.shop buytko.shop gro11t.com bitniq.net lun-deploy.com mytrexbic.com bitvaf.com kadenion.shop mginnovant.com buy-cladven.com depstitch.com dep66r.com gro11t.icu tairdan.com spx99x.org spx99x.com spx99x.net xa600b.com xa81p.com zmoku.com coinargon.com quantcex.com kadenion.icu raxtren.icu rovum.icu deepstitchai.com wavex.hk nasdaq.pw trardun.com clardven.com buy-kvaden.com xai60p.com binswap.io pinet-exchange.site xmrbridge.org tvardin.cfd nexahash.io changebit.pro getflashbtc.com revoketool.org tronveil.xyz phantomix.pro gasless.pro hypercopy.org collaterax.com aviorswap.com spx45k.com spx45k.net spx45k.org spx45k-cointelegraph.com spx45k-fxempire.com spx45k-techbullion.com spx88k.com spx88k.org spx88k.net spx88k-fxempire.com spx88k-coinpwire.com spx88k-cryptoslate.com spx88k-centurylink.com spx88k-cointelegraph.com amlfy.pro evmforge.com
Source?
years of effort collecting sources, validating fraud sites, cross-checking etc etc
I mean, it looks like you might be a bot. No formatting. No introductory or explanatory text. No methodology. No way to know how you define “fake/scam”. No information on your “sources”. For all I know, it may be all LLM hallucinations.
Raw data isn’t good enough. I need basis on which to evaluate whether it is what it’s purports to be.

