• stom@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m impressed, the camera didn’t shake one bit, even when the shockwave rolled over it.

      • Madison420
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Bingo. It’s a fuel air bomb, the telltale shockwave is pretty… Telling. Other bombs can create the same sort of shockwave but a fuel air bomb relies on that shockwave for most of its effect.

    • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 days ago

      There would be reporting if they used a nuke, it wouldn’t be hideable. The physics only let you minitaurize nukes to a certain point, and I think tactical nukes are almost as close as you can get to that penumbra.

      • nibbler@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        no, that’s not my job. I’m just here to point out obvious bullshit and sensationalist headlines.

        • Madison420
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Misleading not sensationalists. It’s accurate and does not lie, it is however implying it’s a never before seen weapon when it’s not they just simply haven’t been caught using f/a bombs in Gaza before.

          • nibbler@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Absolutely sensationalist. It’s as accurate as any ‘some unspecified/broad source said it felt like X’. That’s always true. That’s worth nothing as a source/headline. So its nothing but sensational.