• calliope@retrolemmy.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 month ago

    1963! That’s crazy, I didn’t even know they had tiny TVs then.

    The equivalent cost of this TV now would be $2,086 accounting for inflation.

    • BilSababOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      and the funny thing is that this tv is probably is still functional even now

  • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    On the left: Flawlessly lit, perfect hair, amazing outfit, excellent pose, lovingly faked image on the screen to which the same applies.

    On the right: “Whatever, this photo is the least squinty one on the roll, print it”