• somas
    link
    fedilink
    251 year ago

    TIL Bohemian Rhapsody was formally the highest grossing biopic. I kind of liked the movie but I know a lot of people who obsessed over Freddie Mercury and they all swear the movie is wretched

      • @mysoulishome
        link
        English
        131 year ago

        I found it terrible but I guess I wanted a Freddie biopic and it was a Queen biopic…I think it was way too sanitized and shallow. They recreated the looks, the clothes, the music and performances but I feel like nothing new or insightful was revealed. There was no emotional intimacy like Walk the Line or Rocketman.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      101 year ago

      I’m super upset Sacha Baron Cohen isn’t apart of it. The band came out and he said he wasn’t that type of actor that could do it or something. Sacha said it’s because they were cleaning up the bio pic too much. Can’t argue with the band on profits though.

      I just thought a lot of lies were unnecessary. The director said it’s just to tighten up the film, but I think a better director could do justice to both.

  • Bri Guy
    link
    fedilink
    English
    241 year ago

    I really liked Rami Malek in Bohemian Rhapsody, but the movie as a whole honestly felt like a medley of Mercury + Queen, kind of glossing over the story very quickly. Not to say I didn’t enjoy it though, and I understand that Queen had a huge say in the direction of the film.

    • @BaronVonBort
      link
      English
      301 year ago

      Brian May is Incredibly protective of how Mercury is portrayed, IMO much to the detriment of what the man truly represented and was. Like yes, he was a rock god but he was also a deeply troubled man who struggled with his identity and sexuality for decades much due to the work of people hiding queer icons behind rose-colored glasses as May has done.

      • @DoctorTYVM
        link
        English
        261 year ago

        Not just Mercury’s story. All those times the movie had Mercury spiraling into sex and drugs and the movie versions of May and the rest of the group were cuddling with their wives and girlfriends. You know, the way they were famous for doing.

        • goldenbug
          link
          fedilink
          91 year ago

          Exactly! Like we would want a rosey Queen. No, we have heard ‘tie your mother down’, we liked the band because of it!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I agree with this 100%.

      The scenes by themselves were great…but the editing was one of the worst I’ve seen in a long time.

  • @EyesEyesBaby
    link
    English
    101 year ago

    Went to see it last weekend, I really enjoyed it.

    • @littlewonder
      link
      English
      41 year ago

      Bold of you to assume I know how myopic is correctly pronounced.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    21 year ago

    Unpopular opinion: biopics are the most boring genre of film and I’m sick of hearing about a new one every goddamn week.

    • @holiday
      link
      English
      33
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I found that even at 3 hours long Oppenheimer was one of the most gripping films I’ve ever seen. Constant tension from not only the ramifications of developing a nuclear bomb, but also the intense and clashing political motives of each of the characters.

      Different strokes I suppose.

        • magic_lobster_party
          link
          fedilink
          31 year ago

          I think the music was a l contributor to it. Even the most mundane conversations had stressful music playing. It’s exciting, but I think Ludwig Göransson could chill down a little bit.

          The stressful lead up to the detonation is one of the best cinema experiences though.

    • 1bluepixel
      link
      English
      71 year ago

      What truly annoys me about biopics is that Hollywood makes no attempt these days at these being true to the real-life characters they’re portraying. They’re 100% fiction using well-known public figures as the source of their verisimilitude. Movies like The Social Network and The Imitation Game, to name just these two, have barely any resemblance to their real-life counterparts. That’s also true of Bohemian Rhapsody.

      Given that, I don’t even understand what’s the point of them.

      • magic_lobster_party
        link
        fedilink
        5
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I got the feeling that Oppenheimer is quite true to the events compared to many other Hollywood biopics. I could read Wikipedia about the events after watching the movie and think “oh yeah, that happened in the movie” for many paragraphs. Some lines in the movie are even accurate word for word.

        The Imitation Game is pure fiction Abraham Lincoln the Vampire Hunter by comparison. It’s a fascinating story to base a movie on, but they decide to throw it all out and instead replace it with something completely made up. I hate how they wasted that potential.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The point is first and foremost to entertain, not be a record for formal historical archiving.

    • @MimicJar
      link
      English
      41 year ago

      Strong disagree. Biopics are one of my favorite genres of film (and TV). It’s interesting to reflect on how someone else experienced or interpreted events. While a biography/documentary might be more historically accurate I appreciate the more entertaining biopics as they often do a better job of conveying the emotion of their characters.

    • Chetzemoka
      link
      fedilink
      3
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Agreed wholeheartedly. That said, Oppenheimer is officially the only biopic I’ve ever watched twice and will definitely watch again someday. Which makes it my favorite biopic, for whatever that is worth about a genre that I loathe.