“DC reserves all rights and will take such action as DC deems necessary or appropriate to protect its intellectual property rights.”

Days after Fables author Bill Willingham—whose work was adapted into Telltale’s The Wolf Among Us—announced he had thrust the series into the public domain as a form of “asymmetric warfare” against DC Comics, the publisher has proclaimed that it still very much owns the rights.

“The Fables comic books and graphic novels published by DC, and the storylines, characters, and elements therein, are owned by DC and protected under the copyright laws of the United States and throughout the world in accordance with applicable law and are not in the public domain,” a statement sent to IGN reads. “DC reserves all rights and will take such action as DC deems necessary or appropriate to protect its intellectual property rights.”

DC’s statement stands in direct opposition to two Substack posts Willingham has published over the last few days. The first, which included the initial announcement that he had decided to offer up the series to the public domain, took multiple stabs at DC’s treatment of Fables as well as a few choice mentions towards Telltale Games and its adaptation.

A follow-up post divulged a few more details, such as negotiations where Willingham claims that DC “reinterpreted [their] contracts to assume they owned Fables outright,” something which he claims was less of a mistake and more that the publisher “tried to get away with something and then retreated once it didn’t work.”

  • jaycifer
    link
    fedilink
    661 year ago

    I was reading a blog post that talks about exactly how much the author is able to put in the public domain. My understanding is that Willingham has a fairly individualized contract with DC that he is grandfathered in on and is rather abnormal nowadays and gives him more control. DC has been trying to, as stated above, “reinterpret” that contract to give them more control.

    Essentially, DC may own the rights to the individual products they published, but the world and characters Willingham created can be used outside of those in new or reimagined context.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      231 year ago

      Thanks for that link, amazing. I didn’t realize how unlikely US is to change copyright length, or how important the creative commons license was

    • Dandroid
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 year ago

      I think it’s likely that if anyone tries to use it as part of public domain, DC will take them to court. At that point, it’s probably completely up to the whim of whoever’s court it lands in.

      • @blackfire
        link
        English
        61 year ago

        If they don’t take him to court and any new imaginings of the material keeps away from what tell tale already created I think it might actually be a DC loss, should they challenge it

    • HidingCat
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      Wow, just read half of it, it’s a really murky situation (as the article mentions).

    • roguetrick
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      That creates a significant can of worms in regards to what parts of the character are derived from the source material that is owned by DC. See not allowing sherlock holmes to smile for an example.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    221 year ago

    If there’s an ownership dispute between the creator of the thing and the people who sell it, I’m always gonna side with the person who created the thing. Publishers are a cancer.

  • Computerchairgeneral
    link
    fedilink
    171 year ago

    Not surprising that DC is pushing back on this, although I’m not sure if there is anything they can do if Willingham is right and he can put his characters and world in the public domain. Although I suppose they could just send out cease-and-desist notices to anyone trying to use the property and hope no one challenges it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      81 year ago

      The original run was creator-owned so he has the right to release it to the public however I am not sure about it now as fables continued on under DC Black Label.

  • This seems kinda random for a game that old and nothing changed between its release and now. Is there a sequel in the pipe or something? Why now all of a sudden would they make this press release?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      111 year ago

      Yes this has all started by the announcement of the reboot of the A Wolf Among Us by a team who bought the rights to TellTale old library.

      That new company didn’t legally have the rights to the new title as they assumed and DC pushed on them.

      In response to this Bill released his creator-owned series to the public domain. Meaning anyone can make adaption of his work now.

      Other examples of creator owned DC comics works is The Sandman and Y: The Last Man.

    • @chuckleslord
      link
      English
      21 year ago

      This is about the comics that game is based on and the characters/settings therein. Not just the material in the game itself.