• @jplate8
    link
    559 months ago

    Okay but raster images can’t represent circles either, since they’re just approximations using squares

    • zero_iq
      link
      fedilink
      289 months ago

      And many “circles” aren’t circles either, but 2D torus approximations. The edge of a true circle is made of infinitesimally small points so would be invisible when drawn. And even if you consider a filled circle, how could you be sure you aren’t looking at a 1-torus with an infinitessimally small hole? Or an approximation of all the set of all points within a circle?

      Clearly, circles are a scam.

      • Kogasa
        link
        fedilink
        189 months ago

        A 1-torus is a circle, you mean an annulus. You do NOT want to make this mistake at a topologist dinner party, trust me.

        • zero_iq
          link
          fedilink
          4
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Damn, so what’s the name of the shape that’s a flat donut with an inner and outer circular perimeters? i.e. a filled circle with another smaller radius circular area subtracted from it. Or 2D cross section of a torus seen perpendicularly to the plane that intersects the widest part of the torus. A squished donut, or chubby circle, if you like.

  • @clemdemort
    link
    399 months ago

    Well I’d argue vector image can represent a real circle but what’s on the screen will never be one.

    Also why is this on Lemmy Linux?

    • @Synthead
      link
      19 months ago

      There are analog vector displays.

      • @clemdemort
        link
        29 months ago

        Ah yes indeed but there must be some imperfections down the line so not a Real circle, though we are getting closer.

        • @Synthead
          link
          59 months ago

          In this sense, we don’t have real rectangles or lines, either