• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    261 year ago

    “Everyone’s focus is to keep 500 people employed,” a source told Variety, referring to the show’s large non-WGA crew.

    Okay then do it, it’s not like you don’t have the cash.

  • @DocBlaze
    link
    23
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    deleted by creator

    • Flying SquidOP
      link
      181 year ago

      It only has one writer, but they’re still a union writer. It also has WGA members performing, which they have the right to do under union rules, but it violates the spirit of the strike.

      • hypelightfly
        link
        fedilink
        71 year ago

        Sounds like it’s time to change the union rules. Union rules should not allow scabbing.

          • hypelightfly
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            Not allowing WGA union members to work on a show that employs a fellow striking member seems pretty straight forward to me. Even if that work is not a writing role covered by the union. This isn’t about the separate but related SAG-AFTRA strike.

            • Flying SquidOP
              link
              21 year ago

              They’re going on with the show without the writer. I assume the producers will do their best to write copy. They’re being scabs, but they’re not violating any union contracts. It sucks, but they’re operating, scummily, within the rules.

              • hypelightfly
                link
                fedilink
                41 year ago

                I understand, I’m saying the rules are broken and need to be fixed.

  • The Pantser
    link
    171 year ago

    Well the 2007 writers strike caused an explosion of reality tv so guess what’s coming next.

    • @CarbonatedPastaSauce
      link
      English
      31 year ago

      My guess is, I’ll still be watching movies and ignoring almost everything on tv!

    • NickwithaC
      link
      English
      11 year ago

      The article doesn’t mention Alfonso after using his image so maybe he’s striking too?

    • Vaggumon
      link
      fedilink
      41 year ago

      interesting that people are down voting my comment, didn’t realize there were scab supporters in Antiwork…

      • @phobiac
        link
        161 year ago

        I think your tone and intent is being misread as somehow being against this being posted, unfairly.

        • @TheFlame
          link
          English
          101 year ago

          That’s how I read it too

      • @CarbonatedPastaSauce
        link
        English
        91 year ago

        You probably should have said “they” instead of “we” to avoid confusion about your intent.