• derelict
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I thought California legally guaranteed public access to all coastlines

    • Drunemeton
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      2 years ago

      That’s correct.

      However in this case this asshole is next to a bit of coastline that you can only get to by crossing his property. On land, by sea you’re free to land there.

      It was available for decades until he bought the property and closed off that bit of land to the public. Effectively gaining his own private beach.

      He’s been fighting against the state for years. Apparently citizens wanting access to public property are now “commies” to this asshole…

      • randon31415
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 years ago

        Someone should open up a ferry business taking people to that beach.

      • JigglySackles
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 years ago

        This twat has been at this for so fucking long now. What a chump

      • zkikiz@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        It’s very hard to undo an easement, like if there was a path to the beach there that anyone could use and now he wants to close the path. Sorry, he loses, that’s how laws work. It’s the one salvation we have in this capitalist hellscape.

    • Miqo
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      2 years ago

      This POS likes to just… block it anyways… it isn’t legal, but he’s worth $6 billion, and it’s only enforced by a small fine IIRC. And when the penalty for breaking a law is a fine, it’s only illegal if you’re poor.

  • SportsRulesOpinions
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 years ago

    In Colombia, private ownership of the beach is just straight-up illegal. It works pretty well, as far as I can tell.

    • RobBanks@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      It is in California too. But rich people like Khosla try to get around that by blocking access to beaches, ostensibly making the private.

    • ssjmarx@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      It is in California too, the problem here afaik is enforcement. Get rich enough and getting fined just doesn’t matter, and the state either can’t or won’t escalate.

  • Holyginz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 years ago

    People like him are self centered wastes of oxygen.

  • Wurstkiste
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 years ago

    Beach access must be a fucking human right! Beaches must remain public property and public property must be accessible by the public. It must not be that billionaires claim such a unique item like beaches all for themselves. That’s entirely unacceptable and as immoral as it gets.

    • zkikiz@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I paste this link about once a week lately. Our society and fundamental rights have been chopped up and sold off to “billionaires” (oligarchs and mercantilists) for hundreds of years, and they spend about one sentence on it in school. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enclosure

  • Jeff@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 years ago

    It would be nice if CA passed a “right to roam” law that allowed one to cross any private land

    • zkikiz@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      The whole country needs it IMO, unfortunately only publicly-owned land with that as a designated use is the equivalent; there is no non-owned land in America, only public, private, or private-but-abandoned-and-about-to-be-repossessed. I agree that private property as “this is all mine even if it looks like an empty plain and if you so much as hover above this imaginary line you’re a criminal” is an awful way to run a society

  • CaptManiac
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    What an asshole this guy is. He’s above the law?!