Since when is this a thing? I thought the indicator LED would be firmware controlled in the webcam (Logitech V-U0040)

Running Cheese on Ubuntu:

While in a video call in my web browser:

  • circuitfarmer
    link
    fedilink
    English
    181 year ago

    As much as it sounds tinfoil-hatty: you cannot trust the indicators.

  • ChapolinColoradoNZ
    link
    English
    161 year ago

    For a long time the LED indicators were part of the enable circuit and therefore hardwired to turn on/off on camera “active”. These days though… The fact that it’s a firmware “feature” already says tons about it.

    • @PM_Your_Nudes_Please
      link
      English
      91 year ago

      Ding ding ding. Unless it’s wired in sequence with the camera sensor’s power, it can’t be trusted. If software can control it, software can easily be used to turn it off.

      • ChapolinColoradoNZ
        link
        English
        31 year ago

        Sorry but I’ll have to correct you there. The webcam (even the ones embedded to laptop screen frames) are a mere usb device, using four wires in total: 2 for power and 2 for serial comms. The device doesn’t get “powered on or off”. There’s a controller chip that handles everything, from the simple usb serial comms to image processing. What I was referring to is that, in the past, there was a pin on that chip which would go high indicating the chip was “called”, as in it had come out of standby. This pin was not software dependent and could not be changed. Manufacturers would use this enabled pin to control the led (amongst other things) but these days they don’t. Mostly because these pins get repurposed depending on the application and so it’s cheaper to use software to configure them with new functions instead of having pins that only carry out a single function. In theory is a smarter way to utilise chips in multiple products but by ignoring true customer privacy.