• Pons_Aelius@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 years ago

    The stat I keep reciting in this context: “SUVs kill >4 people outside the vehicle for every passenger they save.”

    Does the author not realise that many of the people driving the SUVs see this as a positive?

    “I care about the people in my car…”

    • mike94100@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 years ago

      The same people who wish it was safer for their kids to walk to school if it wasn’t for all those other dangerous drivers and SUVs. Also SUVs are more likely to run over your own kid in the driveway due to worse visibility if I recall correctly.

    • swope@kbin.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 years ago

      I am not the author, but I’m thinking that they are reciting this stat in the context of policy conversations. Probably aimed at NHTSA more than drivers.

  • mike94100@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 years ago

    It’s almost become an arms race of sorts. Cars getting bigger and more dangerous so people have to buy even bigger cars to feel safe.

    • swope@kbin.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 years ago

      I’ve heard that NHTSA rules & guidelines only consider vehicle occupant safety, and pedestrian safety is not considered. I think we should be including the total risk of these vehicles to the whole community.

      • mike94100@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 years ago

        Haven’t heard that before, will need to look into it. Big one I’ve heard is CAFE standards (fuel economy) are more lenient for light trucks vs passenger cars. I think this was mainly for shipping/work vehicles, but companies took advantage to sell bigger cars for better profit.