• dot20
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      Necessary because script kiddies are constantly hammering all the locks in the world.

  • nicotinell@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Is it just me or removing any or both of the bottom locks wont work because the bar wont be able to pivot enough to be taken out?

    Edit: nvm you can rotate the rod and slide the bar sideways.

  • Drewelite@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    2 years ago

    Lmao, I can’t tell if this is stupid, or genius access control. Like if they had problems figuring out which one of their six employees was leaving the lock open, give them each their own lock!

    • Mr. Frog@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      2 years ago

      You usually see these on fields that are co-owned or need to be accessed by several municipalities. Everybody gets their own key but can still have access to the area whenever needed.

      • Cha0zz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 years ago

        Wouldn’t just duplicating the key achieve the same purpose or am I missing something?

        • The Gay Tramp@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          2 years ago

          Duplicating the key removes some accountability. With this set up you can revoke access to only one person, while leaving the access in place for everyone else. If you had a single lock with six copies then a bad actor getting a copy means you’d have to replace everyone else’s keys

          This also means one person can’t take their lock off and replace it with another, and therefore lock out everyone else

        • Arrayrepairman
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 years ago

          One case I’ve seen this, local PD, Sheriff, city Park District and county Forest Preserve District all needed access. They ech have dozens of hundreds of their own locks keyed the same, so they only need to carry one key, but they all need access to this one gate. If it was only one gate, it would be inconvenient but not too difficult, if it was a dozen shared gates, each with different overlapping agencies and each with their own key, every officer or employee would need a big ball of keys again, defeating the reason behind their keyed alike locks they already have.

  • arandomthought@vlemmy.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 years ago

    ngl, i kinda like this. Want to revoke access to any of the users but can’t trust them to hand back their key(s)? Np, just change their lock.

    • siriusmart@feddit.ukOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      nah I think it’s a brute force attack, it takes a several tires depending on if the lock is hard

  • Cynosure
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    There are better ways of doing this such as this, or if you value your money, a chain.