The investigation — which escalates a long-running feud between the SEC and Musk — concerns whether Musk broke federal securities laws in 2022 when he bought stock in Twitter, which Musk renamed X, as well as statements and SEC filings he made in relation to the deal.

The SEC said it subpoenaed Musk in May 2023 requiring him to provide testimony at the SEC’s San Francisco office, and that Musk had agreed to appear on Sept. 15. But then two days beforehand Musk raised “several spurious objections” and told the SEC he would not appear, the SEC said. Musk also refused to SEC proposals to conduct the deposition in Texas in October or November.

Among his objections was that the SEC was trying to “harass” him and that his counsel needed time to review potentially relevant material contained in a biography of Musk published last month, the SEC said.

  • Dr. Dabbles
    link
    English
    1389 months ago

    Couldn’t be happening to a more deserving guy. Between the racism lawsuits, his ex-girlfriend lawsuit, investor lawsuits, former executive suing him, and now the SEC? I hope this is the year we take all of Elon’s money.

    • @Fredselfish
      link
      749 months ago

      Just shows how weak our government is against the rich. If the SEC order any of us to appear we would appear or go to jail. These fucker can even ignore subpoena.

      • Dr. Dabbles
        link
        English
        349 months ago

        They couldn’t even enforce their settlement with him over the fraud he was investigated for at Tesla. Which doesn’t even count all the fraud they turned a blind eye to.

        • @Pieisawesome
          link
          -69 months ago

          Cause the SEC is a civil enforcement group.

          They can’t arrest you

          • Dr. Dabbles
            link
            English
            199 months ago

            I’m extremely aware of what the SEC is. They explicitly chose not to go back to court when Musk refused to abide by the terms of the agreement that was further clarified by the court after he refused to abide by the settlement terms initially.

            Having to type a whole extra paragraph just to make pedants happy makes the internet suck.

    • @TheGoldenGod
      link
      319 months ago

      All of this could be why he’s slowly morphing into Kathy Bates, he’s looking for a disguise we might trust.

      • downpunxx
        link
        fedilink
        139 months ago

        I know a guy whose ankles would disagree strongly with that assesment

      • Dr. Dabbles
        link
        English
        89 months ago

        The only hypothesis that makes sense so far, IMO.

    • WalrusDragonOnABike
      link
      fedilink
      89 months ago

      Even if we could just take away 99.9999%, that would be nice. He’d still be several times wealither than the average american his age.

      • Dr. Dabbles
        link
        English
        59 months ago

        That’s acceptable to me, look what he pisses his money away on. The other .0001% would be gone quickly.

    • fiat_lux
      link
      fedilink
      69 months ago

      As much as I would love for that to happen, money just gets shuffled around between companies and people like cards at a casino. It’s exceptionally easy to launder it when you’re that wealthy.

      And then even if you do somehow manage to remove all his assets, he still maintains his existing social networks and connections, which may be enough to get him back to a similar position.

      Prison is necessary if he has committed financial crimes. Anything less is merely finger-wagging.

      • Dr. Dabbles
        link
        English
        39 months ago

        Yeah, I mean, none of us are that lucky. But is a life without dreaming a life worth living?

        • fiat_lux
          link
          fedilink
          39 months ago

          It’s the wrong day for me to answer that question too honestly, but I understand your point. Keep on dreaming and living the dream, friend.

      • @Fedizen
        link
        19 months ago

        musk reportedly burns a lot of bridges (you have to in order to get that filthy rich)

  • @bostonbananarama
    link
    279 months ago

    I think you’re confusing harassment with oversight. You know, the entire point the SEC exists.

  • Jaysyn
    link
    fedilink
    169 months ago

    So is this criminal or just civil? Because he’s practically immune to civil lawsuits in the USA.

    • stankmut
      link
      English
      119 months ago

      The SEC is suing to get a court order to compel his testimony in an investigation. Assuming the court grants that order, which is likely, he will be forced to cooperate with the SEC or face the prospect of sitting in jail for contempt of court.

  • @Mago
    link
    149 months ago

    Lets be real - someone this rich will not be punished regardless of what he does.

    • Flying Squid
      link
      59 months ago

      You never know. Look what happened to Abramoff and Epstein.

      • @Mago
        link
        29 months ago

        Some optimism is nice on a Friday 👍

      • WuTang
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -89 months ago

        you lost all credibility
        Elon is a douche maybe but he is not a criminal and not even close (in Year lights) to these 2 pieces of shit.

        • Flying Squid
          link
          69 months ago

          The SEC apparently disagrees on the ‘not a criminal’ part.

            • Flying Squid
              link
              49 months ago

              So you have to be charged and convicted to be a criminal? I guess OJ Simpson didn’t commit a crime.

              • WuTang
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -49 months ago

                So, you are against the Presumption of innocence?

                Interesting

                • Flying Squid
                  link
                  49 months ago

                  I’m not a court of law. When I become one, I’ll care about the presumption of innocence. I’ll let you know when that happens.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    109 months ago

    This one’s especially funny to me, Musk already HATES the SEC for probing his previous stock trading shenanigans

  • @SleepingTower
    link
    99 months ago

    Why does every post of this clown have a picture of him cosplaying as Dr Evil? If newsrooms can attach unflattering photos of Zuckerburg, they should be able to use unflattering pictures of Musk.