• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    91 year ago

    Has it gotten to the point as being as enjoyable as that one game 3 guys put together and released for a third of the cost?

    No?

    Waste of their time then, lol

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 year ago

            It is

            I didn’t realize how starved for a game like it I was until it dropped and I suddenly had hundreds of hours in it

            I used to really love battlefield, but even trying 2042 again after BattleBit released I just can’t go back

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              I dumped a ton of hours into Battlefield 3, and the Bad Company games. Now in terms of BF, I mostly play Battlefield 1943. I tried 2042 but immediately hated it. They gutted the game of everything that made the series so good.

              Totally going to snatch this one, thanks!

              I used to play Urban Terror a ton back in the day. Not a massive game like BF and BattleBit but it’s a super fun shooter (and it’s free!).

    • Dudewitbow
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      As much as i can enjoy battlebit, you arent giving battlefield enough credit

      The populations of the games at the current moment arent even that far off, Battlebit is at 8k, 2042 is at 5k+whatever the number plays on origin.

      Battlefield has a LONG history of always releasing in a shit start and getting better overtime. This trend has happened for the past several games (since after 3 I believe)

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 year ago

        No, I’m giving battlefield all the credit it’s current incarnation deserves:

        It is not as good as a game made by 3 guys on Unreal. I tried it again last week out of curiosity and it’s flat out not worth getting when BattleBit exists, in my opinion

        And a long history of releasing trash and getting to decent only proves the point, BattleBit actually started as an enjoyable and decently content filled product whereas battlefield you KNOW won’t next time it comes around

        • Dudewitbow
          link
          fedilink
          English
          0
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The point is it’s playerbases are in a similar tier in size. Of course its your opinion that battlebit is better (and is mine too), but that doesnt stop the idea that there are plenty of people playing 2042 now (especially vs launch). I have a friend who has both games, but when hes playing alone, he more often boots up battlefield more often then battlebit, and he spends a LOT of time playing those games more tham the rest of his library.

  • @fox2263
    link
    English
    31 year ago

    Wake me up when they release 2142

    • @9715698
      link
      English
      31 year ago

      They would absolutely ruin it.

  • @Edgelord_Of_Tomorrow
    link
    English
    11 year ago

    I literally don’t care if it’s God’s gift to video games if they haven’t removed operators yet.