• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    221 year ago

    Best of all, the Vancouver study concluded that doing so actually reduces government spending.

    Makes you wonder about the people dead set against this sort of thing

    • @CheeseNoodle
      link
      English
      151 year ago

      Its not about cost effectiveness its about being punitive.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Unfortunately, quite a lot of people only feel self worth through others misery. You could give them everything, but if others didn’t have less they’d be miserable.

    • @GeneralVincent
      link
      English
      71 year ago

      They’ve likely associated homelessness with drug use, and drug use with a moral failing. Or they just don’t have any empathy at all and are ignorant of the benefits we all get from helping those in need.

    • @surewhynotlem
      link
      English
      21 year ago

      The same as payday loan places. Prey on the vulnerable to keep them vulnerable.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    111 year ago

    Yes, but you see this policy isn’t cruel enough to be implemented by the christian right

  • @Wilzax
    link
    English
    61 year ago

    Cool, now make it happen for everyone with no questions asked. Then we cut out the overhead of seeing if you qualify and stop people from complaining about how it incentivises you to be lazy.

    No level of effort will make you earn less than you did before, as can happen when you earn enough that you no longer qualify for the programs that let you take the first steps out of poverty. But it will still be cheaper for the government (and therefore the taxpayer) at the end of the day because we won’t be wasting as many resources trying to heal people who are only sick because they were suffering extreme poverty, or are only addicts because it’s the only way to make their practically hopeless living situation slightly more bearable, or are only unemployed because every job makes them earn too much to stay on SNAP benefits or Medicaid (US examples, I know, but I’m willing to bet similar Catch-22s exist near you).

    • Doug HollandOPM
      link
      English
      41 year ago

      “No questions asked” is brilliant.

      The people who need aid most — any kind of alleged aid program — are not capable of navigating the proof and paperwork maze. That’s not accidental, it’s cost control. All aid programs should be as close to “no questions asked” as feasible.

  • @alienanimals
    link
    English
    61 year ago

    The only people against UBI are rich assholes and people who wish they were rich assholes.

    • Doug HollandOPM
      link
      English
      01 year ago

      Hey, I wish I was a rich asshole, and I’d love to see UBI.

      • @alienanimals
        link
        English
        2
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Honestly, your comment is great on many levels. I bet you’ll get rich one day.

        • Doug HollandOPM
          link
          English
          01 year ago

          Seems unlikely at my age, but I do take checks.