• @bazus1
    link
    English
    321 year ago

    What a great way to advertise your location

    • Pons_Aelius
      link
      fedilink
      151 year ago

      New control system.

      Have a suicide drone head straight for the interference signal, HARM style.

    • @Rand0mA
      link
      English
      61 year ago

      Im pretty sure the control amd video feeds for my drone is switchable between 2…4ghz and 5.8ghz… Range of 7km with uprated antennas, and its just an old dji phantom. Nothing fancy. Instantly doesnt give a shit about this tank tech.

        • @Rand0mA
          link
          English
          31 year ago

          Honestly, I never tested that distance. I reached about 5km piloting from a hill, with a clear line of sight, video (on 2.4ghz) and the control (on 5.7ghz) with good signal still for both feeds.

  • FiveMacs
    link
    fedilink
    English
    211 year ago

    I’d be halarious if these photos were taken from a Ukraine drone while Russians were operating the tank…also wouldn’t surprise me

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    19
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    They are terrible anti drone nipples then, considering you can easily find off the shelf drone RF antennas at the 400 MHz range easily, which is below 900 MHz. You can also easily find on the 5.8 GHz range.

    Must be why drone attacks are so effective against Russia.

    • @[email protected]M
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      400MHz? you mean 430MHz-ish, which is near 70cm band?

      i heard that Ukrainians are using 900MHz band for long range drones, that puts it near ISM band also used for LoRa and some other applications like this

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      What are the most common ones though? Jammers in UHF are shorter range than the VHF jammers, and so these would help with the network.

      It also doesn’t do you any good if you’re trying to attack the tank and all you have is 1GHz+ drones. Equipment isn’t made to deal with anything and everything, after all the radar isn’t obsolete since it can’t defend against an artillery shell.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        4
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        433 MHz, 915 MHz and the “wi-fi ones”, 2.4 Ghz and 5.8 GHz are the most frequent in off the shelf components

        433 MHz is banned in Europe but allowed in the US.

        915 MHz is banned in the US, but allowed in Europe.

        The wi-fi bands (they don’t go by that name, it’s just most commonly known for that specific use) are allowed everywhere per international convention.

        I’m just saying, they could have selected the jammers better.

        • @[email protected]M
          link
          fedilink
          English
          4
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          there’s also 3.4GHz band, rarely used, could collide with some radars

          433MHz could interfere with some 70cm band radios, depending on how badly are all these baofengs misused

          Of course, if you make your own drones from scratch, you can make them work on any part of spectrum, including what is normally advised against. There are tradeoffs to be done, but not all rules of electromagnetic compliance will be adhered to in wartime

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            I think if their jamming goes up to 3 GHz, the sidebands of the jammer might affect at 3.4 GHz too, but yeah, there is also that one.

            The problem with making your own RF systems is that Ukraine would require a steady supply of RF components, which might be hard to secure in war time over off the shelf, which probably have stocked supply lines in most places, through hobbyists stores.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    121 year ago

    “Dammit man, it’s like tits on a Russian tank” was not a phrase I was expecting to learn had some veracity this week

    • @ProfessorProteus
      link
      English
      41 year ago

      Oh you know there’s some anime out there where they depict tanks as girls. They’ve already done it with warships, right?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        I know of warships as girls, guns as girls and fighter planes as girls but I’m not aware of tanks as girls.

        • Kitty Jynx
          link
          English
          21 year ago

          The youtuber Cone of Arc uses a tank girl avatar so there is at least one out there.

      • Astro
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        There is a series called “Girls Und Panzer” I think

        • @pinkwerdo
          link
          English
          11 year ago

          But the tanks aren’t girls.

  • PugJesus
    link
    fedilink
    61 year ago

    “Rubber nipples? Hm. No, I don’t think I need any rubber nipples. But you know what I do need? WALRUS PROTECTORS”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    21 year ago

    If remote control doesn’t work anymore it’s time to roll out the fully automated AI killer drones that hunt down anything that moves. Nothing can go wrong, surely nothing can go wrong…

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    11 year ago

    Could be useful against those drone dropped grenades. Especially at shorter range. Actually a good idea, though they still look funny.