Oh boy, what’s her name is gonna have a field day with this.

uh oh. I can see some province going cowboy on environment the rest be damned.

@ValueSubtracted bummer, let’s hope the USSC doesn’t see this as an invitation to further eviscerate environmental protections down here.

This is the best summary I could come up with:

Canada’s top court has delivered a highly anticipated judgment, writing in a majority opinion that Ottawa’s Impact Assessment Act (IAA) is largely unconstitutional.

The IAA, previously known as Bill C-69, allows federal regulators to consider the potential environmental and social impacts of various resource and infrastructure projects.

The IAA has long been controversial among conservative politicians in Alberta, including former premier Jason Kenney, who frequently referred to it as the “no more pipelines act.”

Writing for the majority in a 5-2 decision, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Canada Richard Wagner said the process set forth in Sections 81 to 91 of the IAA were constitutional and could be separated out.

Rather, it reflects this Court’s flexible approach to federalism, which recognizes that overlapping powers are unavoidable and intergovernmental cooperation is essential."

Today’s decision was keenly awaited by legal experts, who recognized its importance in providing clarity to an area of law that has long been under debate.

The original article contains 495 words, the summary contains 158 words. Saved 68%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!