A safety panel highlighted the urgency of safely deorbiting the International Space Station (ISS) after it retires in 2030, warning of a catastrophe if the spacecraft were to make an uncontrolled reentry through Earth’s atmosphere.
NASA’s Aerospace Safety Advisory Panel (ASAP) urged the space agency to develop a space tug to deorbit the ISS, saying that the deorbit vehicle is “not optional,” according to Space Policy Online.
“The day will inevitably come when the Station is at the end of its life—and we may not be able to dictate that day—it is inconceivable to allow the Station to deorbit in an uncontrolled manner,” ASAP Chair Patricia Sanders said during a briefing at the panel’s third quarter meeting on Thursday. The ISS is “simply too massive and would pose extreme hazard to populations over a broad area of Earth. This needs to be resourced and resourced now if we are to avert a catastrophe.”
Why is this in scifi?
This is the exact opposite of science fiction.
Exact opposite? You sure about that?
Half opposite, at least. Definitely science, but not fiction
but not fiction
If you believe what the round globists teach.
Am I missing something?
The exact opposite of science fiction is science fact. Or at least real science.
What were you thinking?
Wouldn’t the exact opposite not have science at all? So if it’s science fiction, then the opposite would be fantasy fact (if such a thing even exists)
It would be nice if we could boost it up to some sort of high storage orbit. Then it could hang out there until we have the technology to drag it down to a museum on the moon or something. Maybe a SpaceX starship will be able to do it before the station reaches end of life.
It is a shame we have to just drop such a monumental piece of history into the ocean. I wouldn’t hold out hope we can move up that much mass to a high enough orbit to preserve it though sadly.
deleted by creator
I don’t think “not optional” means what they think it means.
I guarantee you that if we do nothing at all, it will deorbit on its own thanks to friction from air molecules it passes through in orbit. Humans only occupy 14.5% of the surface of the planet, so even in an uncontrolled deorbit it seems like the odds would be against any property damage or loss of life.
An uncontrolled deorbit might be reckless. It might not be recommended. But it’s definitely an option.
an option that should not be considered = not optional
