• @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        171 year ago

        I read that, but I don’t know if that means they will publish stable releases via the same repository. That just sounds like the packages themselves will end up being in those channels (which makes sense, nightly becomes beta, which becomes a release, which ends up as esr). It doesn’t necessarily mean this apt repository will be a release channel itself.

        That said, there is the Mozilla Team PPA.

  • Oliver Lowe
    link
    fedilink
    221 year ago

    Good to see development effort going towards actual Firefox and not those random Mozilla products that I can’t keep track of

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      261 year ago

      Do you mean products like their VPN? They really need the revenue to try and become more independent from Google. Right now something like 90% of their income comes from a deal with Google to make Google the default search engine.

  • katy ✨
    link
    fedilink
    111 year ago

    kinda wish they would put nightly on fdroid too instead of just google play or through the website

    • Kogasa
      link
      fedilink
      81 year ago

      Never built Firefox from source but Chromium takes way longer than the kernel for me. Like half an hour on a 5800x3D. Bit much for nightly updates.

  • AutoTL;DRB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    81 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    While Mozilla has always produced Firefox Nightly builds for Linux as traditional binaries, they have finally decided to offer up an APT repository of Firefox Nightly builds to make it easy to stay up-to-date with new Firefox Nightly releases on Debian and Ubuntu Linux based distributions.

    Mozilla announced today they have setup an APT repository as an easy option for using Firefox Nightly on Ubuntu/Debian-based platforms.

    The Firefox Nightly Debian packages will also see better performance thanks to extra compiler optimizations, additional security hardening with extra security-related compiler flags, and easily stay up-to-date now via the APT package management.

    Eventually the packages will become available for Beta, ESR, and release branches of Firefox from this APT repository too.

    More details on this long overdue Firefox APT repository via Mozilla.org.


    The original article contains 129 words, the summary contains 129 words. Saved 0%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    51 year ago

    Some day they will offer linux version that you can download from from the website and install without using terminal.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      01 year ago

      Whilst I agree that that’s a nice option to have (more options are usually better!) I’ve come to love the linux way of distribution via repositories. These days I barely use the cli too: GNOME software and KDE’s Discover are great. Perhaps an official nightly flatpak would be best?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    11 year ago

    So how many debian packages with firefox are now available? debian sid, stable, testing & firefox nightly?

  • @TCB13
    link
    English
    -121 year ago

    Does it include unique IDs for each installation as well? What snitching to Mozilla every single time you launch the browser and a 3rd party analytics company even after disabling everything that can be disabled via settings and config?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      10
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      snitching to Mozilla every single time you launch the browser

      It’s only for the first run, to track downloads and installations. Pretty much every mobile app on both Android and iOS, and a lot of desktop apps, do the same thing as they want to know how many people install (and uninstall) their app.

      It’s also only if you download the installer from the Firefox site, so Linux repos are unaffected.

      • @TCB13
        link
        -8
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Dude, fire Wireshark, launch Firefox and then come back here. Just because others do it, doesn’t mean it is decent nor should Mozilla do it and no, its just not once, Firefox is constantly going for their servers for multiple reasons, not all requests include the ID that’s true, but calling 3rd party analytics companies… from a browser… kind of questionable. We all know there are other ways to fingerprint a browser.

        Stop believing on the narrative of the all savior Mozilla. They’re full of shit, less than others indeed, but still shit.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          3
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          All I was saying was that the unique download ID is only used once, not every time you start Firefox. I wasn’t making any other claims as to what other analytics they use.

          Having said that, Telemetry is important to making a good product. The developer needs to know about crashes and what causes them (to fix bugs), which features people are using the most and least (to know what to work on and what to potentially deprecate), etc. As long as it’s anonymous, I don’t see a problem in that?

          • @TCB13
            link
            English
            -41 year ago

            Telemetry is important to making a good product. The developer needs to know about crashes and what causes them

            Telemetry is the new age bullshit excuse and alternative to proper in-house software testing and money cuts. Why hire testers and have public testing programs if you can just deploy to the end users, let it break and then collect logs. You’ll get tons of PII as a bonus :)

            • @ante
              link
              English
              51 year ago

              No amount of in-house testing is going to catch everything that can be experienced on a nearly-infinite amount of hardware/software configurations that are tested once a large userbase gets a hold of a product.

              • @TCB13
                link
                English
                -21 year ago

                Yeah I guess NASA, Lockheed Martin and Airbus all use analytics for testing instead of actual testing. You seem to be very unware of the current corporate trend of replacing in-house testing by analytics as a cost cutting strategy.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  31 year ago

                  I do wonder why billion dollar companies (or in the case of NASA, an organization that AFAIK is still funded directly by the government) can afford to do this.

                  I’d also argue that extremely rigorous testing is a bit more important in terms of life-or-death scenarios for the companies that you mentioned, rather than Mozilla - but hey, that could just be me.

                  I mean come on, your comparison might work for a company that can hold a candle to the ones you mentioned (ie, Google or Apple) but how large do you think Mozilla (who still has to take handouts from Google essentially) is? Even then, I’d still say it’s probably a bad comparison given my second point.

                • @ante
                  link
                  English
                  01 year ago

                  Yeah, embedded systems for military applications is exactly the same as consumer software. You’re right.

            • katy ✨
              link
              fedilink
              11 year ago

              tell me you’re not a decent software developer without telling me you’re not a decent software developer

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I am sure there will be a aur package soon bundling this deb into a arch package. So nothing to worry about (for the good package managers)

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -11 year ago

        Hehehe. What about RPM users? This fragmentation in Linux packaging robs users of choice.

        Would rather have Firefox setup a repository for the nightly channel, after all they official maintain the stable channel on Flathub.

        That way everyone benefits from the utility.