(…) Ben Gvir and Smotrich leading the charge

Late last year, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu entered into a coalition government with Itamar Ben Gvir’s Jewish Power party and firebrand Bezalel Smotrich’s Religious Zionist Party.

Ben Gvir’s far-right Jewish Power party was founded by Meir Kahane. A far-right rabbi and former MP, he previously led the Kach party, an organisation which was outlawed by Israel after one of its followers gunned down 29 Muslim worshippers at the Ibrahimi Mosque in Hebron as they prayed.

Meanwhile, Smotrich, a self-declared “fascist homophobe”, was appointed finance minister and also handed broad authority over civilian issues in the West Bank, enabling him to increase settlement construction and thwart Palestinian development.

Since then, Smotrich has been in charge of civilian affairs in Area C of the occupied West Bank, where Israel has full security and civilian control. (…)

  • @NatakuNox
    link
    221 year ago

    They are not settlers! That’s the wrong word. Maybe invaders, but definitely genicidal maniacs

    • @Linkerbaan
      link
      141 year ago

      Colonists fits way better

      Settlers make it seem like they’re just building their homes in uninhabited places.

      • thatsage
        link
        11 year ago

        They are. Just not on owned legal land by them… They’re not moving into existing houses or something like that which, the impression I got, you think they do.

      • livus
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        @Linkerbaan settlers sounds like a bunch of violent colonists to me.

        Maybe it’s because I come from a country where settlers came and took people’s land etc.

        • NoneOfUrBusiness
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          No, conquerors implies there’s some kind of war. Killing random civilians and taking their homes isn’t conquering anything.

    • @Therealgoodjanet
      link
      131 year ago

      Yeah the word “settler” sounds so benign, but displacing human beings and chasing them from their homes is far from benign.

      And I’m not even talking about any of the violence, murder and trauma that’s often involved.

      • HobbitFoot
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -31 year ago

        How many times have people “settled” areas that didn’t have others living on there?

    • NoneOfUrBusiness
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      To anyone who’s keeping up with Palestine, settler doesn’t sound like anything but “invading genocidal maniac”, so in that case it’s the appropriate term.

    • roastedDeflatorOP
      link
      fedilink
      -91 year ago

      I wonder why you say this? Anyways, I had the same conversation yesterday, so I hope you won’t mind if I just copy-paste the answer.

      According to the United Nations they are settlers. [link - March 2022]

      “There is today in the Palestinian territory occupied by Israel since 1967 a deeply discriminatory dual legal and political system, that privileges the 700,000 Israeli Jewish settlers living in the 300 illegal Israeli settlements in East Jerusalem and the West Bank,” said Michael Lynk, the UN Special Rapporteur for the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territory occupied since 1967

      Also even The Times of Israel calls them settlers
      Palestinian shot dead by settler while harvesting olives in West Bank – report

      So, I think it would be fair to say it is the correct word?

      • @NatakuNox
        link
        7
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Let me ask you something… If I threw Molotov cocktails through your windows while you and your family slept. Then built my new house on the ashes. What am I?