• Lowlee Kun
    link
    fedilink
    3811 months ago

    Its about god damn time. Not sure why one senseless slaughter should satisfy another senseless slaughter but i guess the answer would be something like humans being a stupid mess.

  • FoundTheVegan
    link
    fedilink
    27
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Honestly that’s not the reason. What changed was a new wave of people not buying their “Israel can do no wrong” BS and are going with the tide. The news isn’t interested in “the truth”, but in having an audience. They are corporations first and journalists a distant second. I know it sounds like I’m gonna go off on a weird fake news right wing tangent but honestly, why else are they so slow on the uptake? The evidence of Isreal ethnostate oppression and brutality over Gaza has been nakedly obvious for a long time now.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      11
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      They are corporations first

      i.e., likely more concerned about alienating sponsors and losing ratings than about innocent civilians getting killed.

    • @SheeEttin
      link
      English
      511 months ago

      Nah, “if it bleeds, it leads” has been the rule throughout the history of for-profit journalism. Now the conflict is controversial, so that’s the angle they take. Some people on one side, some on the other, so the news hypes up the conflict to get views from everyone.

    • eric
      link
      911 months ago

      We’re up to 9k now.

  • TWeaK
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1311 months ago

    The UK’s Channel 4 news presenters have been asking the difficult questions all the way through.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      811 months ago

      I think most of Spain’s outlets were pretty damn critical from the beginning. Germany on the other hand…

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        611 months ago

        In German state media a comment was printed, that basically said “Israel is a democracy and so they won’t commit any war crimes. And if they do, there will be consequences afterwards”. It was an awful read, basically giving Israel free reign.

    • @masquenox
      link
      1211 months ago

      That’s what IDF stands for… when your military exists purely to wage war on a marginalized “other,” you throw the word “defense” into it’s name to pretend that your military does not purely exist to wage war on a marginalized “other” - it’s the same reason the Apartheid-regime called it’s military the SADF.