• @AstrealixOPM
    link
    English
    61 year ago

    Hot take: if the ball counts as in there despite it being literally impossible to tell and looking out to the naked eye, either the rule should be changed or the lines should be required to have GLT all across the four lines.

    • @coygsu
      link
      English
      6
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yes, GLT across the line would be definitive.

      • @AstrealixOPM
        link
        English
        61 year ago

        It’s the only way to justify this rule. Otherwise, it should be just if the portion of the ball on the ground or something, idk how it would be worded but this rule is simply untenable

        • @coygsu
          link
          English
          31 year ago

          Any portion of the ball can hover of the line and it is till in. That’s the rule. VAR needs a definitive angle. There wasn’t one.

          • @AstrealixOPM
            link
            English
            31 year ago

            Yeah so the ref lets play go on because VAR will fix it and then VAR can’t so by default there’s more leeway for the attackers

            • @coygsu
              link
              English
              1
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Correct, if the ref doesn’t know something definitively, they should let play go on - no matter the case.

              • @AstrealixOPM
                link
                English
                21 year ago

                Yes. But then we either need VAR to actually be able to make a decision, or the ref should be allowed to make it according to his best judgement, which won’t happen; so it should be down to VAR to judge as best they can instead of clear and obvious error

                • @coygsu
                  link
                  English
                  11 year ago

                  That’s why an extended GTL is the only best option.

    • Nuggsy
      link
      English
      11 year ago

      I was just thinking that to your last point… crazy we can tell if the ball crosses the line for a goal, but can’t tell if the ball has gone out of play.

  • @sensiblepuffin
    link
    English
    51 year ago

    You know, we often talk about the dark arts, but we clearly haven’t reached Newcastle’s levels of rotational dissent

  • MHPengwingz
    link
    English
    51 year ago

    Argue more Bruno G, argue some more

  • @AstrealixOPM
    link
    English
    51 year ago

    Honestly in a game like this, kinda glad we have Jorgi on the pitch to just be calm

    • @Gingerrific
      link
      English
      21 year ago

      Him and Rice together give us such a strong and compossed midfield

      • MHPengwingz
        link
        English
        31 year ago

        I love players who got his paycheck and rightfully earns it

  • @sensiblepuffin
    link
    English
    51 year ago

    BRO there were 4 minutes taken for the VAR check ONLY. How the fuck is 8 minutes acceptable?

  • @AstrealixOPM
    link
    English
    41 year ago

    Just give a card to Bruno already

    • @EK13
      link
      English
      11 year ago

      Insane that he doesn’t have at least one already

  • @sensiblepuffin
    link
    English
    41 year ago

    Havertz showing his worth there. Hopefully he can get some more balls to Eddie

  • @AstrealixOPM
    link
    English
    41 year ago

    When even Gary Neville thinks you’re fucking wrong

  • @AstrealixOPM
    link
    English
    41 year ago

    That ball is defs out lol

    • @coygsu
      link
      English
      11 year ago

      It is partially in. There is no definitive angle.

  • @coygsu
    link
    English
    41 year ago

    Bruno G hits Jorginho in the head. Hits Havertz with the ball. Then tries to choke Rice. How is he not booked once? Fishy stuff going on upon Tyne.

  • @sensiblepuffin
    link
    English
    41 year ago

    So we gonna go back and review that elbow?