• bottleofinkOP
    link
    fedilink
    21 year ago

    It’s a lot to go through, the biggest one yet. Personally, I’m thrilled that they backed off from requiring templates for Druid’s Wild Shape, but still feel some type of way they’re now limiting your number of known forms. I sort of understand it, but I don’t love it.

  • static
    link
    fedilink
    2
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I posted the same pdf 10 minutes before you, it makes no sense to have duplicate topics so I deleted mine.

    On the Druid:
    They reverted most of the structural changes to the Druid, and buffed it a bit.

    It feels more well rounded, not only focussed on wildshape.

    • bottleofinkOP
      link
      fedilink
      2
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Aw I’m sorry! I didn’t see it but there was a short gap between when I looked and when I posted, my bad.

      I definitely do appreciate the variety of things they’re introducing that you can utilize in place of Wild Shape. It’s interesting that with that, they reverted from calling it expending a use of Channel Nature back to expending a use of Wild Shape, which makes a little less sense IMO.

      • static
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        No problem, it was indeed a short gap.

        I loved Channel Nature as a name, I’m sad they reverted to wildshape. But for the rest It’s a pretty cool druid for a caster.

  • jay
    link
    21 year ago

    rad, thank you for posting. I’m only just stumbling through this now!