• Drusas
    link
    fedilink
    4911 months ago

    On Wednesday, a ProPublica investigation traced how a Michigan company would not pay for an FDA-approved cancer medication for a patient, Forrest VanPatten, even though a state law requires insurers to cover cancer drugs. That expensive treatment offered VanPatten his only chance for survival. The father of two died at the age 50, still battling the insurer for access to the therapy. Regulators never intervened.

    Land of the free*.

    *As long as we can fleece you.

    • TechyDad
      link
      2811 months ago

      My mother-in-law’s sister survived cancer once. Years later, she started feeling pain and worried that the cancer had come back. Her insurance company repeatedly denied basic scans/tests to see if the cancer had returned.

      My wife’s cousins finally got sick of all this and paid out of their own pockets for the tests. She had cancer again. Only by this point, it had spread. It was in the base of her tongue and was blocking her throat. They had to remove her tongue, but that didn’t stop the cancer. She eventually passed away.

      Would she have survived if the insurance company approved the tests in the beginning? There’s no way to guarantee this, but she would definitely have had a better shot at survival.

      But at least the insurance company saved some money, right? Isn’t that the most important thing? 😡

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    4911 months ago

    As long as the cost of breaking a law is less than the cost of complying, American businesses will choose breaking the law every single time.

    • @NateNate60
      link
      1711 months ago

      American governments often fail to realise that they literally hold all the cards. At any time they can dissolve or threaten to dissolve a company for flagrantly disregarding the law, and yet this rarely happens.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        15
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        In fact the opposite is true. Since Citizen’s United allowed unlimited bribery political donations, companies hold all the cards. Unlimited funding and advertising can make or break most any candidate’s chances for election, especially in purple areas.

        • @NateNate60
          link
          211 months ago

          Believe me when I say that a dissolved company can’t fundraise shit.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Explain please, exactly who’s going to do the dissolving? The same government representatives who are controlled via donations by that corporation? Wishful thinking doesn’t make it so.

  • @PeleSpirit
    link
    English
    42
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    deleted by creator

  • LazaroFilm
    link
    English
    1411 months ago

    Oops. My bad, there. I changed the law. — the health insurance company.

  • @Nurse_Robot
    link
    1211 months ago

    This news story has come out every few years for decades now. Nothing has changed.