You mean the same Judge who granted Trump a partial injunction preventing the DOJ from reviewing the documents Trump was keeping at his residence only for an appeals court to strike it down writing: “[Trump] has not even attempted to show that he has a need to know the information contained in the classified documents, nor has he established that the current administration has waived that requirement for these documents.”
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
There’s danger in those waters. But yes, something needs to be done.
deleted by creator
There’s room for being understanding - but these bad faith actors use our willingness to give the benefit of the doubt so that they can build plausible deniability for themselves, while never intending to operate in good faith.
Imo, three strikes and you’re a shill.
continually going for Trump
The phrasing makes it sound like she is acting against Trump, but I think what the person being quoted means to say is that she is acting to protect Trump.
Nah, I think it means she’s a goer. Know what I mean? Know what I mean? Wink, wink, nudge, nudge, say no more, say no more. A nods as good as a wink to a blind bat. Know what I mean?
