• @zekiz
    link
    English
    351 year ago

    They actually are in a position to do this.

    Nobody is switching to let’s say PeerTube because of something YouTube does as long as not every creator is switching too

    • @WhoRogerOP
      link
      English
      241 year ago

      They are, but even YT won’t last forever. TikTok and IG are eating their lunch badly, and as YT continues to chase after that market and keeps neglecting and pissing off people that bring value to the platform, something just might crop up as an alternative.

      I mean, a month ago many thought Reddit is irreplaceable, and now look around.

      • @zekiz
        link
        English
        131 year ago

        But reddit is fundamentally built different than other social media platforms. Reddit is more like a collection of forums than a social media platform. The only thing that keeps people on reddit is the content and that can be moved.

        On Youtube its the Algorithm and the Content Creators that keep people to use the platform. PeerTube and LBRY simply don’t have the creators Youtube has.

        On reddit people choose what to see. On YouTube the algorithm simply is wayy more important than on reddit.

        • @WhoRogerOP
          link
          English
          91 year ago

          Exactly, it’s about creators and content. If enough creators get ticked off, they move, content moves with them and users follow.

          Let’s not overestimate the algorithm too much. Big Tech thinks it’s some godsend technology, but it’s just another buzzword meaning “stream of content”. If you don’t have any special care about what you’re looking at, then you can just scroll r/all or the TikTok front page, algorithm or not. And if you want some particular creators, you go where they go.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            31 year ago

            but creators won’t move because YT fights adblockers. Creators make money from the ads, so this actually improves YT for them.

            • @WhoRogerOP
              link
              English
              3
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Nobody makes money off YT ads, all the creators who do content for money are paid from donations or sponsors. (Ok maybe not those who make just 30 sec clips. I mean people who make useful content.)

              So at most this is meaningless. But it’s not like YT is exactly friendly to creators. There are constant complaints about YT breaking shit, their inconsistent and unclear rules and overall incompetence.

              One of these days YT will also piss off someone important who will move elsewhere with millions of viewers, and starts the flood.

              It’s not just about ads. Everyone knows Google is an extremely toxic company for all the parties except themselves.

              • trainsaresexy
                link
                English
                3
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Content creators do make money off ads*. Do you mean they make more money from sponsors and donations?

                • @WhoRogerOP
                  link
                  English
                  11 year ago

                  I mean the revenue stream from YT is so unreliable. You say shit once in the wrong context, and poof demonetized. Or just for no reason. No creator of actual quality content really makes much from YT, because YT prefers to serve stupid consumer nonsense. A lot prefer to not have ads served on their videos at all (at least if that’s still an option, I don’t even know).

              • @zekiz
                link
                English
                11 year ago

                If that would really be true than they wouldn’t complain about being demonetized

              • @righteous_angst
                link
                English
                11 year ago

                You definitely make money off adds. It’s not like TikTok. You get a percentage of all ad revenue. Depending on your audience you can live off ads alone.

          • Captain Minnette
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            I doubt many creators are going to be ticked about getting more views that count towards ad revenue.

      • @Etterra
        link
        English
        81 year ago

        This is the inevitable problem with publicly traded companies in our lovely capitalist society. The line must go up, no matter the cost. Of course it makes no sense, they’re just chasing the short term perpetually without ever noticing the cliff that just past their field of vision.

      • @Danatronic
        link
        English
        61 year ago

        I’m also hopeful for more creator-owned services like Nebula and Dropout. They tend to run off extremely cheap subscription models (about $5 a month for Dropout, less than $2 a month for Nebula) and all that money goes to the creators with very little business overhead in the way.

        • @Etterra
          link
          English
          31 year ago

          I never gave a damn about dropout, and when they laid off Drawfee - literally the only thing worth watching - I just followed drawfee’s new solo channel. It’s kind of drifted too far into the Millennial mainstream, but what you going to do. I’m a Gen-Xer, a cynical understanding that the world is trash is just part of my lifelong worldview.

          • @Danatronic
            link
            English
            11 year ago

            Fair enough but I am absolutely willing to pay $5/mo for Brennan Lee Mulligan’s D&D Show Plus Some Other Stuff I Probably Won’t Watch.

      • @x4740N
        link
        English
        21 year ago

        Tiktok also has the issue of being a shady company

        • @WhoRogerOP
          link
          English
          11 year ago

          More than Google or Meta?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      14
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      True, but I don’t think this will result in a migration to PeerTube like it was for Reddit to Lemmy. Instead it will make people put more effort into bypassing YouTubes adblocker detection efforts.

    • @SPOOSER
      link
      111 year ago

      They’ve been raging on Twitch for a while now. Having an adblocker for Twitch has been like playing whack-a-mole, except your adblocker is the mole Twitch is trying to whack.

  • kitonthenet
    link
    fedilink
    151 year ago

    Twitter makes you sign in to look at tweets, which makes the site worthless now

    • cjsolx
      link
      fedilink
      5
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Lol oops, I deleted my account a week or two ago so I guess there’s no reason to ever visit again ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

    • @righteous_angst
      link
      21 year ago

      Guess I’ll exclusively get my tweets via screenshots on other platforms now

  • @PeterPoopshit
    link
    English
    14
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It’ll probably end up being like twitch. You can either watch 5 minutes of blank or 5 minutes of ads. Either way, hopefully it won’t take yt-dlp long to be compatible. I mostly download my YouTube videos to a local server then search and watch them later just because my internet isn’t reliable. I assume this will soon become the only way to watch YouTube if you want to resist that idiotic propagandist.

    • @WhoRogerOP
      link
      English
      5
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Indeed, whatever they do, they won’t be able to stop people from downloading and watching later. And if they start baking ads into videos (which I doubt), there’s always sponsorblock. Possibly with some AI assistance eventually.

      Btw what propagandist?

      • @XanXic
        link
        English
        41 year ago

        Even for me, I pay for Youtube Premium, if I can’t use SponsorBlock I’d probably watch way less youtube and consider canceling lol. Like it’s such a better experience. I was able to get it on my browser, phone and TV so I’m living the dream but I’m concerned.

  • @x4740N
    link
    English
    101 year ago

    Laughs in ublock origin

    • @adinfinitum
      link
      English
      101 year ago

      I looked up the article and it says they’re limiting users with an adblocker to 3 videos pet day. They’re testing it out on select users for now. Enshitification is killing all the sites I actually use(d) all at once

      • @techtalkf
        link
        English
        5
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Laughs in NextDNS

        There’s always a backdoor.

      • @Renacles
        link
        English
        31 year ago

        There is always a workaround.

    • frevaljee
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      Sure, but yt creators will not move there unless they can monitise their videos, which is difficult without ads.

    • @marswarrior
      link
      English
      71 year ago

      There are only 2 types of effective ads.

      1. Ryan George sponsored comedy skits
      2. Old Spice commercials with Terry Crews
      • @duhdugg
        link
        English
        11 year ago

        No kidding. Most ads make my skin crawl. Ryan George is so good at it though I would legitimately turn off ad blocking just to watch.

  • @adinfinitum
    link
    English
    91 year ago

    I have the lower tier subscription to HBO max because the adblocker kills the ads. After the rebrand, the ads came back. Updated extensions and poof. Gone again.

    It’s like those frogs that evolved to be immune to snake venom, so the snakes evolved to be more venomous, and then the frogs got more immune, on and on it goes (almost said “ad infinitum” but that’s weird with my username)

  • @Jpopy
    link
    English
    81 year ago

    Premium just seems like too expensive a proposition for the casual viewer. I use an adblocker but if they made premium five bucks a month I’d probably just do it. And I think many people wouldn’t mind paying that to avoid ads.

    • @WhoRogerOP
      link
      English
      191 year ago

      I maintain that Google shouldn’t be supported. They make gazillions from spying on user data and controlling an insanely large part of the internet and users’ devices. They also have some control over finances with another revenue stream already through GPay.

      They don’t need even more money from us.

      • @Jpopy
        link
        English
        61 year ago

        I hear your point - you’re not wrong. But I believe that any service that you enjoy is worth paying for. Services cost money and at the end of the day, it’s a for profit company. That said, as a very casual viewer I’ll do what I can to avoid paying, since, to your point, they make plenty of money off of us. If I were a heavy YT user, I’d probably just pay to avoid dealing with all of the ads.

        • @WhoRogerOP
          link
          English
          121 year ago

          I don’t want to berate you or anything, so don’t get me wrong. I just want to explain my position a bit further.

          it’s a for profit company

          Capitalism has two sides: the sellers and the customers. The seller’s job is to make the most amount of money for the least amount of product or effort.

          The customer’s job is to get the most product for the least amount of money.

          It’s an adversarial relationship. Don’t forget that. It doesn’t mean we need to be enemies, but the sides are fundamentally opposite.

          If customers start saying that companies need to make money, they’re forgetting their role.

          Don’t do that. Be selfish. Don’t do the sellers’ job for them. They sure as fuck won’t return the favor.

          We’ve been shifting from being customers to consumers. We don’t even find that word weird anymore, as if it’s completely natural to just consume without any critical thought.

          Because corporations employ smart people whose entire job is to think of new ways how to fuck you over, you’re in an inherent disadvantage. So again, at least don’t make it easy.

          Furthermore,

          any service that you enjoy is worth paying for

          Sure, but are you enjoying the service YT provides, or the content people make?

          What happened with Reddit was a good example about the owner of infrastructure forgetting that it’s the users that make thing happen.

          Reddit or YT without users are only empty shells, yet they think they own everything and can dictate everything.

          People use adblocks because YT can’t be reasonable with their ads. They’re creating the problem and then selling you the solution. That’s what those smart people employed there do.

    • islandmonkeee
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      I hate subscriptions, and I would rather prefer paying a large one time fee.

    • @Petter1
      link
      English
      11 year ago

      There is always the possibility to “travel“ to India using VPN (only needed to start subscription) Just use separate account for the play store, if you are android user

    • @marswarrior
      link
      English
      11 year ago

      Is it because you work for google? just kiddin

      • @space_gecko
        link
        English
        51 year ago

        A coworker of mine used to be in upper management at Google, and apparently helped increase ad clicks by a 8% during his time there (I have no idea what the scope of his responsibilities were, so that number might not mean anything).

        He eventually realized that he wasn’t making anyone’s life any better (quite the opposite) and decided to quit and find something meaningful to work on.

  • Variden
    link
    English
    61 year ago

    Yewtube for the win!!!

    • @WhoRogerOP
      link
      English
      71 year ago

      Actually yewtube is down today, but other Invidious instances and Piped are fine

      • Variden
        link
        English
        21 year ago

        Invidious is a really good concept btw

        • @WhoRogerOP
          link
          English
          21 year ago

          I like Piped better because it includes SponsorBlock but half the time it won’t play any video, so I usually use Yewtube…

          • Variden
            link
            English
            21 year ago

            I will look into Piped. Looks good

  • TwoGems
    link
    English
    5
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    deleted by creator

    • @teolan
      link
      English
      91 year ago

      Check out peertube. Like Lemmy it’s federated so here is the most interesting instance, TilVids.

      • @Flim
        link
        English
        31 year ago

        TIL about peertube. I love the concept of P2P federated video content. I wish it became mass adopted.

  • @dusky
    link
    English
    51 year ago

    Time to get a Pihole

    • @rookie
      link
      English
      11 year ago

      does that still work with stuff like the new twitch ad system?

      • @dusky
        link
        English
        11 year ago

        I’m not sure, I’ve never made one heh