The piece was nearing publication when the journal decided against publishing it. You can read the article here.
This is such a powerful article, thank you for sharing. Should come as no surprise that Harvard Law Review refused to publish, I’m sure their endowments are heavily vested in the military industrial complex.
If this is now, imagine censorship before the internet…
I actually do not get this type of headline. Outlets are not required to publish what is put in front of them. The title should just be the second half basically.
On Saturday, following several days of debate and a nearly six-hour meeting, the Harvard Law Review’s full editorial body came together to vote on whether to publish the article. Sixty-three percent voted against publication. In an e-mail to Egbariah, HLR President Apsara Iyer wrote, “While this decision may reflect several factors specific to individual editors, it was not based on your identity or viewpoint.”
What a crock of horseshit.
Click bait nonsense. I bet Harvard Law Review rejects 20 papers a day.
