• conciselyverbose
      link
      fedilink
      17 months ago

      1 generation that was a dogshit excuse for a CPU when it was released a decade ago.

      The PS5 SoC is genuinely a solid piece of tech. The performance is reasonable and the hardware features (primarily the hardware compression/decompression to accelerate data loading) actually matter.

      The time between games doesn’t matter when the hardware is night and day.

        • conciselyverbose
          link
          fedilink
          07 months ago

          Age is completely irrelevant. The purpose of a remaster is and always has been to take advantage of newer hardware. The difference in hardware, in and of itself, justifies a remaster. There is a huge difference mechanically in the gameplay between Zero Dawn and Forbidden West. I haven’t played the PS5 version of the Last of Us, but I’m assuming it’s the same.

          The games were held back significantly by the hardware, and because they’re done with modern tooling, they can be done a lot more easily than older games, allowing them to pass the savings on by giving you a cheap upgrade if you own it. They’re nothing projects, and aren’t holding back other projects.

    • Zoolander
      link
      English
      17 months ago

      What was wrong with “that Daniel Craig abomination”? That game was awesome and an incredibly good recreation of the original.

        • Zoolander
          link
          English
          17 months ago

          No, it was a James Bond movie and a James Bond game. Craig was the current Bond. You’re confusing business decisions with whether or not the game was good. It was. It wasn’t an abomination.

            • Zoolander
              link
              English
              27 months ago

              Brosnan was an actor. He was paid to play a character. James Bond is a character. He has been played by many different actors. It’s not like they just took the old GoldenEye and slapped Craig’s face on it. You’re being ridiculous. It was a great game.

    • @9715698
      link
      English
      07 months ago

      Like Alex said, it starts to make sense if they bring it to PC, but they should call it a director’s cut, not a remaster.

      • Zoolander
        link
        English
        37 months ago

        It’s not a director’s cut, though. Words have meanings. A remaster reuses assets but may contain reexported versions of assets at higher quality than the original. A director’s cut is using the same assets, at the same settings, but with editorial changes or unused pieces reinserted. They’re not the same thing.

        • @Kelly
          link
          English
          -1
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          A director’s cut is using the same assets, at the same settings […]

          I don’t think that’s how Sony has been using the term lately.

          • Zoolander
            link
            English
            27 months ago

            That’s irrelevant. Words have meanings. Just because they’re using the wrong words doesn’t excuse that it’s wrong.

            • @Kelly
              link
              English
              -1
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              If they are porting a game and while they do so they:

              1. Add features
              2. Clean up some assets and/or target resolution, frame rate, etc. as appropriate for the new platform.

              #1 Would qualify it as a DC, but according to OP, #2 would disqualify it.

              • Zoolander
                link
                English
                2
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                It would not. The term “director’s cut” means editorial changes only.

                Each of these terms has a specific usage in development:

                Director’s Cut - No new assets are created. Existing assets that were created originally and cut may be added back but no code changes are made and changes are editorial only.

                Remaster - No new assets are created. Existing assets may re-exported at higher qualities or fidelities to make use of newer systems and technologies but code changes are rare and only made when necessary to make the game work on newer systems or take advantage of features that can be used with existing assets.

                Remake - Assets are recreated from the ground up and code is rewritten from scratch. Existing assets and code may be used as starting points or as references but are not included in the final product or are materially changed so as to be considered different versions.

                I’m not sure who you mean by OP #2 so I’ll ignore the subjectivity of those posts and just leave it at that. In your example, #1 would not qualify as a DC and #2 would be considered a remaster, not a DC. Sony’s usage is consistent with the developer language used in other companies. E.g., Last of Us Part I is a remake - levels were changed and new assets were created, FFVII is a Remake - new levels and assets were created, LoU2 is a remaster - new assets aren’t created but were exported at higher fidelity while taking advantage of new capabilities of newer platforms.

                • @Kelly
                  link
                  English
                  17 months ago

                  Sorry “OP #2” was unclear, I’ve inserted a comma to separate the terms.

                  The comment I quoted from originally claims:

                  A director’s cut is using the same assets, at the same settings, but with editorial changes or unused pieces reinserted.

                  Sony’s PS5 ports of Death Stranding and Ghosts of Tsushima had both additional content and improved framerate/resolution/etc to target the new platform.

                  To my mind Sony’s branding of ports these as DC was cynical marketing move, and effort to sell the upgrade to people why had already played the original when it was released.

                  Despite my scepticism I think the Director’s Cut label can be applied accurately as they had added some extra content too.

  • @ProtecyaTec
    link
    English
    67 months ago

    Really, I’d just like to play and own Last of Us Part 2 on Steam…

  • @ShittyBeatlesFCPres
    link
    English
    47 months ago

    A remaster of a modern game probably just involves creating (or even just generating) some higher res art assets and some minor new features (like support for adaptive triggers). It’s not like they’re shutting down production of a Parappa the Rappa game for this.

  • @the_ramzay
    link
    English
    37 months ago

    Nope. But Sony, please, Bloodborne 60fps

  • @ANIMATEK
    link
    English
    27 months ago

    Well I haven’t played those games and I probably would if they remaster them. I didn’t have a PS4 so I’m kinda the target audience.

    Keep in mind that a remaster is not comparable to creating a new game or even a remake like RE4. This is low-effort and high-yield, so expect to see more of it.

    • Zoolander
      link
      English
      0
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      I see this all the time on Lenny but it’s so pervasive it’s annoying now (“this” meaning people whining about things they’re not the target of). You’re 100% right. These are easier ways for studios to make back money via a newer target audience. They’re not meant for people who have already played the games. Not every product is for everyone and companies will definitely try to squeeze every dollar out of work already done that they can.

  • @AgentGrimstone
    link
    English
    27 months ago

    Nope. They’re not even that old. I haven’t even gotten to playing TLOU2 yet and it feels like that just came out last year to me.

  • @Otakulad
    link
    English
    17 months ago

    Why not make a new IP instead of remakes? I think mostly because it is easier to do a remake and doesn’t cost as much.

    • @echo64
      link
      English
      67 months ago

      These are remasters. It’s not anything like the effort of making a new game, you can do both.

  • @Sanctus
    link
    English
    07 months ago

    No, we don’t. Where the fuck is Drakenguard, Destroy All Monsters, Monster Rancher, A New Spyro IP, Gauntlet?

    I know these are all different studios (excep Spyro). But there are countless great IPs left in the dust right now.

    • MonsterFenrick
      link
      fedilink
      24 months ago

      There’s been SOME activity in MR in the last couple years…
      MR1&2DX is a remaster of the first 2 games with some QoL improvements, on Switch, Steam, iOS, released in 2021
      Ultra Kaiju Monster Rancher is a crossover, though only on Switch, released in 2022
      LINE:Monster Farm is a JP only mobile gacha game released in 2023, but some folks hope it will come to the west… it has some amazing artwork.

      There’s also hope for MR3&4 “DX” release but those weren’t very financially successful originally, so it’s probably unlikely they’ll be rereleased, but everyone’s huffin’ that hopium.