Following weeks of silence by women’s organizations and international bodies, UN secretary-general says issue needs to be ‘vigorously investigated’; Israel’s UN envoy: ‘When it comes to Israeli women, sexual violence that has been proven and determined by state authorities still needs to be investigated’

Against the backdrop of widespread anger in Israel over the silence of women’s organizations and international bodies regarding the severe sexual violence used by Hamas terrorists against women in the attack on October 7, UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres announced Thursday that these actions must be thoroughly investigated.

“There are numerous accounts of sexual violence during the abhorrent acts of terror by Hamas on 7 October that must be vigorously investigated and prosecuted,” Guterres wrote on the X platform

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    121 year ago

    It’s so ridiculous how one of the commenters here normalizes the HAMAS terrorist attack with their uncovered whataboutism.

    • Limitless_screaming
      link
      fedilink
      -51 year ago

      Hamas is not an acronym.

      The whataboutism is valid, because most of the “anti Hamas” crowd would excuse these acts as self defense if they were done by the other Terrorist organization.

        • Limitless_screaming
          link
          fedilink
          81 year ago

          They’re already defending the self defense mass arrests with no charges, the self defense tear gassing of people praying in mosques, the self defense punishing Palestinians for killing a lunatic who killed 20 of them while they were praying, and many other products of self defense™.

          I haven’t even gotten to the acts that are getting excused by the 7th of October attack. So yes; I wouldn’t be surprised if I woke up tomorrow and found the self defense rapes looking me in the face.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -11 year ago

            Dude, I just don’t understand. For every action there is a reaction, right? You have a solution how to separate wolves from the sheep? Go ahead and pitch it. Otherwise, stop spreading this whataboutism. There was a terrorist attack. It cannot be dismissed. The responsible for it must be punished. You must blame the terrorists for what is happening to the people in Gaza.

            Research the Russian invasion of Ukraine. You either don’t understand, or you are paid to spread what you say.

            • @twisted28
              link
              English
              1
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              deleted by creator

  • @mawkishdave
    link
    English
    111 year ago

    Well if the UN is doing it we all know nothing will get done.

  • @generalpotato
    link
    English
    10
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Investigation into Israeli war crimes when?

    Investigation into on-going occupier (err “settler”) violence when?

    Investigation into 6k dead Palestinian children when?

    Let’s investigate all sides.

    • @kromem
      link
      English
      11 year ago

      I’m assuming you aren’t aware of the UN having investigated Israeli war crimes in 2009 which was highly regarded by the Middle Eastern delegates specifically for its having investigated and reported on the war crimes of both sides of the conflict.

      You might also be unaware that the investigation was originally chartered to only look at and investigate Israeli war crimes, the very opposite of what you seem to think is the UN’s position in their investigations. As the delegate to the HRC from Lebanon put it (regarding the involvement of the lead investigator who had also been the UN’s lead prosecutor of war crimes in Yugoslavia and Rawanda):

      He rejected the first mandate of the Human Rights Council for the Fact-Finding Mission because it called for investigation of violations committed only by Israel. He did not accept that assignment until his request to expand the mandate to include all violations of human rights and international humanitarian law which were committed in the context of the military operations conducted in Gaza was granted.

      Unless the UN has changed dramatically in the past decade, they’ll definitely be investigating Israeli war crimes.

      • @generalpotato
        link
        English
        11 year ago

        We’re in 2023. I assume you aren’t aware of how a decade old news isn’t relevant to the discussion anymore.

        You seem to indicate it will happen. I’m asking when?

        • @kromem
          link
          English
          11 year ago

          Probably like with literally every other war crimes investigation.

          After the hostilities are over so a full accounting can be made.

          • @generalpotato
            link
            English
            11 year ago

            That’s convenient isn’t it? Lay seige, let nobody in and then “wait” for a war crimes investigation instead of creating channels for an independent investigation when everybody in the world was asking for one, see numerous hospital and school bombings from example. This is the same Israel that didn’t let aid into Gaza, if you have trouble recalling how generous and compliant they are.

            Ironically, war crimes investigation in an active war zone is a thing.

            https://news.un.org/en/story/2022/09/1127691

            • @kromem
              link
              English
              1
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Why is that ironic?

              Also the UN already set up a similar initiative back on Oct 10th just three days into the war for the same looking at birth sides in the Israel/Palestine conflict (which was an extension of an existing ongoing investigation since 2021):

              Commission of Inquiry collecting evidence of war crimes committed by all sides in Israel and Occupied Palestinian Territories since 7 October 2023

              You might want to spend a bit of time Googling your preconceptions, as well as the difference between parallel preliminary reports of ongoing hostilities and the final reporting (which is typically what gets more attention).

              You seem really upset over a thing not existing which in actuality existed literally three days in.

              • @generalpotato
                link
                English
                11 year ago

                Setting up an investigation over something does not mean it will happen, especially when the area is under siege and the risk of evidence disappearing increases with each bomb dropped. I’m not sure what you’re trying to get at here? Is it the just that they’ve set up an initiative to investigate all war crimes? Cool, again, for the third time, when is that going to happen?

                We’re going in circles because you aren’t acknowledging the deplorable conditions, lack of access and the eventual removal/destruction of evidence that could have helped shed light and convict both sides. But, for some reason, you’re trying to convince of something that is either irrelevant or useless.

                I’m not upset, but I’m poking at the lip service and inaction of holding people accountable, which typically becomes the case when the West’s interests are at stake.

                • @kromem
                  link
                  English
                  11 year ago

                  You were the one just saying that investigations during conflict are a thing pointing to Ukraine, and indeed the UN made the same exact type of commitment as the one they’d made in Ukraine here.

                  And if you’ve ever bothered to read any of their war crime reports you’d know the types of evidence they rely on which will absolutely still exist after the conflict is over as well as during their parallel reporting.

                  In fact, in the 2009 report Israel completely stonewalled the investigation and didn’t participate at all, which led to a rather condemning report regarding Israel. Though a few years later the lead investigator said that information which came to light afterwards regarding Israel’s behavior actually meant the report was erroneously harsh regarding Israel’s conduct and had they participated with the investigation and provided their side of the evidence he’d not have had the report as harshly condemning their actions in the conflict.

                  So Israel’s refusing to participate in investigations can and did actually play out the opposite way from what you think. They just as a matter of principle do not participate, much like how the US refuses to be subject to the ICC.

                  Maybe the reason it seems we’re going in circles is because you just don’t actually know much about the subject and are resistant to learn because it goes against your preconceived notions, preferring confirmation of your pre-existing beliefs rather than knowledge that causes dissonance when it disagrees with them.

    • @blahsay
      link
      English
      11 year ago

      Whataboutism top marks!

      • @generalpotato
        link
        English
        21 year ago

        Asking for accountability when war crimes and a genocide is being overlooked isn’t “whataboutism”. Maybe you’d know that if you knew what the term actually meant.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        I don’t think this is whataboutism, and actually, even if it is, you’re using it to deflect a good point. All things that could be considered ‘war crimes’ should be investigated for all parties.

        It’s called being fair, and it’s a reasonable position.

  • @kromem
    link
    English
    2
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Most people commenting seem not to know that the UN a little over a decade ago did in fact investigate both sides and reported on war crimes from both Hamas and Israel.

    So comments like “when will the UN investigate Israeli war crimes” have an answer of both “in 2009” and “given historical precedent, yeah they likely will investigate both.”

    In fact, the 2009 investigation was initially only chartered to look at Israeli war crimes before being broadened to look at all crimes from any side of the conflict.

    The announcement of investigating sexual violence in a given attack isn’t occurring in a bubble, even if users jumping in to represent “their side” aren’t aware of the broader context before commenting.

  • @ghostdoggtv
    link
    English
    01 year ago

    Equal protection of human rights is not whataboutism and any operator who engages in this type of misinformation is a puppet of the colonial regime

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -71 year ago

    The sexual violence experienced by Palestinian prisoners charged with no crime and held indefinitely in Israeli prisons? The babies who were left to die as the IDF forced doctors to leave?

    Well, that’s just business as usual. No reason to investigate that. The UN is fucking worthless.

    • Limitless_screaming
      link
      fedilink
      111 year ago

      The UN is fucking worthless.

      The UN is indeed nearly worthless, but not for lack of the investigations they conduct (or intend to conduct at least).

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 year ago

      Hamas is clearly in the wrong here, but I agree that the Israeli government has also committed atrocities against Palestinians.

    • @blahsay
      link
      English
      01 year ago

      Go go whataboutism!