Sony says Mythbusters and more Discovery TV shows are going away whether you bought them or not

  • @21racecar12
    link
    127 months ago

    I totally understand the outrage and in absolutely no way do I take Sonys side on this, paying is supposed to be ownership. However the terms of service cover them from head to toe, their terms define “buy” as the right to stream the show, not download it forever and have it available in perpetuity. Start voting with your wallets people, this isn’t the first time a company has done this and it is far from the last.

    • snooggums
      link
      fedilink
      227 months ago

      Words should mean what they mean and not be weasel words in an ever changing terms of service that the company has complete control over.

      • IndiBrony
        link
        English
        -27 months ago

        Lanuage often changes to reflect useage. Kind of like how ‘literally’ literally has an official dictionary definition nowadays meaning ‘figuratively’.

        If companies use ‘buy’ to mean ‘rent’ or ‘borrow’, then eventually ‘buy’ will come to mean the same as ‘rent’ or ‘borrow’.

        • snooggums
          link
          fedilink
          7
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          What word will replace buy for ownership instead of it just ending up as meaning two completely different things?

          I am complaining about companies knowingly using words differently than common usage, not the fact that words change over time.

          • netburnr
            link
            English
            27 months ago

            No word will, buy will be done, you will never own anything in the future, only rent.

    • Savaran
      link
      57 months ago

      Not to mention just as much of the blame should be on Discovery, who’s pulling this kind of shit all over the place, including removing shoes from HBO that they own the licenses of.

      Personally my long held belief is that things should become public domain and lose their copyright protection if after they’ve been released they’re not kept available at reasonable prices compared to similar products on the market

      • snooggums
        link
        fedilink
        27 months ago

        They should go in the public domain in a reasonable number of years like they were originally designed to, just like patents. Both served the purpose of protecting commercial use for a limited time to promote innovation. Patents still promotes, copyright stifles due to extending the duration to a ridiculous amount.

        • Savaran
          link
          17 months ago

          Oh for sure. But I mean this as a more immediate result of trying to subvert existing licenses.

    • snooggums
      link
      fedilink
      117 months ago

      Then they should call it that instead of ‘buy’ when you rent it.

  • ArugulaZ
    link
    fedilink
    47 months ago

    I’m not against streaming per se, but I do tend to buy DVDs as back ups, because they’re so cheap and readily available. I don’t particularly give a damn about resolution… a good television show in 480p is still a good television show.