• @Tattorack
    link
    English
    261 year ago

    Wait… Does Lord of War even need a sequel? Wasn’t it based on some real life guy?

  • @glimse
    link
    English
    161 year ago

    Everything gets a sequel now doesn’t it

    • @BroBot9000
      link
      English
      171 year ago

      Yes cause new ideas are risky and scary to the executives. Oh no, a new concept might not rake in buckets of nostalgia money. Can’t risk people not liking something new, let’s regurgitate every possible franchise and property in the pursuit of unending growth of the box office revenue.

    • roguetrick
      link
      fedilink
      5
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s not a new thing. Look back to radio dramas and dime novels and you’ll see the same thing.

  • TWeaK
    link
    fedilink
    English
    61 year ago

    Seeing as the article doesn’t really say much about the movie itself, just the logitistics and financials of making it:

    with Cage reprising his role as arms dealer Yuri Orlov, and Skarsgard on board to play his son. In Lords of War, Orlov discovers he has a son, Anton, who is trying to top his father’s wrongs rather than stop them as he launches a mercenary army to fight America’s Middle East conflicts.

    Source

  • Bri Guy
    link
    fedilink
    English
    41 year ago

    please please please just be entertaining to watch, i don’t mind seeing more unhinged nic cage!

  • @paddirn
    link
    English
    21 year ago

    I thought that read “‘Lord of the Rings’ Sequel” when I was first scanning the headline and was a bit confused.