• Zagorath@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    3 years ago

    There is a 0% chance that AI can accurately determine if someone is 18 or not, even with hypothetical futuristic AI technology. Some 20-year-olds look very young. Some 16-year-olds look shockingly old. And nobody changes very significantly between the day of their 18th birthday and the day they were 17 years, 364 days.

    • Resistentialism@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 years ago

      Hell, even 13-15 year olds are looking much older. I genuinely saw one in normal clothes, took a guess based on her being around maybe 20. Saw her a day later in school uniform. And only under 16’s wear them.

      Really did make me realise I am shit at age guessing.

    • platypus_plumba
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 years ago

      Exactly, this is something that even humans would have a hard time doing. Even though AI can do many things better than humans, humans are better at vision at the moment.

      • Zagorath@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 years ago

        humans are better at vision at the moment

        Eh, humans are better at certain kinds of vision—particularly on tasks that deal with non-white people where the AI was trained mostly on white people.

        But things where the vision is looking at very fine detail, AI is very good at. Like determining if a patient has a disease based on a retinal scan or other medical imagery.

        And I think it’s fair to say that, at least superficially, the problem in this thread seems like it might be more similar to those medical cases where an AI could do a really good job. The problem is that actually, no. There’s no known marker that could determine age with the level of accuracy that would be required for this task.

        • platypus_plumba
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 years ago

          Agreed.

          Anyways, still a very stupid idea. People can pick an old person’s selfie in the internet. Whoever proposed that is really dumb.

  • dgmib
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    3 years ago

    ‘cause if there’s one demographic that couldn’t possibly have the aptitude, resourcefulness or motivation needed to defeat a scheme like this it’s horny teenagers.

  • kakes@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    3 years ago

    Surely this won’t block lots of legitimate users, while simultaneously being trivially easy to bypass by submitting a picture of literally anyone.

    • Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      3 years ago

      But it’s so much more than that. It’s a privacy nightmare in general and a boon for anyone interested in blackmail.

      Totally gonna work this time though.

      Such a complicated series of tubes, ye olde internet.

    • momocchi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      3 years ago

      Simply AI generate an adult face, it’ll be AI the whole way down

      • Kalkaline @leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        3 years ago

        Or alternatively send a dick pic, if they are underage, now they’re in possession of child porn, congrats you played yourself.

          • DarkThoughts@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            3 years ago

            I swear I’ve read a similar headline a while ago of some teen being charged for that, because they sent nude selfies of themselves.

            • Pons_Aelius@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              3 years ago

              That is where I got the (fucked up) idea from.

              IIRC: In USA. Teen sent nude pic to his girlfriend, both 16. He was charged with distributing child porn and put on a sex offender register for life.

  • amio@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    3 years ago

    The UK should stick to things they know, like tea, comedy shows, fox hunting, and unelected MPs.

  • Chemical Wonka@discuss.tchncs.deBanned
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    The government says selfies for AI verification are to “protect” children from such content but in reality we know it’s all to create a database with biometric hashes of everyone and create the long-awaited dystopia of 24/7 mass surveillance. The government that completes the task first comes out ahead, and it seems that China is winning the dispute

    • Drusenija
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 years ago

      Maybe they can use all those sexy pictures of John Oliver that got posted in protest over at Reddit.

  • Gazumi
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    3 years ago

    And so the last steps to privacy are removed.

  • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 years ago

    What’s the porn site going to do when AI determines that a 15 year old is over 18?

    “Judge, I swear the AI said she was 18!”

  • fadhl3y@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 years ago

    Classic - clearly some British politicians have shares in a facial AI company.