• @spamfajitas
    link
    English
    1310 months ago

    Maybe they shouldn’t have spent any money hiring the fucking Pinkertons? 🤷‍♂️

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1110 months ago

    That’s 1100 of 6400 employees. I’m sure there’s little rhyme or reason to who got cut and who ‘survived’.

    I love the article highlighting how much the CEO made last year as he discusses this measure of last resort.

    Useless trash CEO wrecking a company rather than just taking a pay cut.

    • @thann
      link
      English
      210 months ago

      I’m pretty sure the CEO makes more than all of those employees combined

      Laughable to think he’s doing more than a sixth of the company lol

  • @CluckN
    link
    English
    710 months ago

    Do you think they were going to layoff 1093 employees and thought, “screw it let’s find 7 more to make it even”?

    • littleblue✨
      link
      English
      110 months ago

      More like their analysts advised laying off 7 and the execs replied, “Laying off 10 is gonna be easy, no one’ll care about a measley 100 layoffs. No public outcry at such an unimportant 1000. You heard the man! 1100 it is!”