• Flying Squid
    link
    221 year ago

    Who determined they were terrorists? How were those confessions gained?

    • @MeanEYE
      link
      -41 year ago

      So those guns they are holding above their heads and bullet proof vests are medical utensils according to you.

      • Flying Squid
        link
        241 year ago

        That doesn’t answer either question. Even if they found a cache of weapons and vests, that doesn’t mean the people they have arrested were the ones responsible for hiding them. Giving them to the people to hold to “prove” they are terrorists is just theater. I’m sure you know that the IDF is perfectly capable of putting rifles in people’s hands.

        • @[email protected]OP
          link
          fedilink
          -81 year ago

          I’m sure you know that the IDF is perfectly capable of putting rifles in people’s hands

          Well I’m in contrary, not sure, and this statement remains false until you prove this statement regarding this article, with a reliable source, otherwise.

          • Flying Squid
            link
            151 year ago

            Do you really think the IDF would allow them to walk out of that compound with loaded rifles in their hands? Or do you think it’s much more likely that the IDF unloaded all of those rifles, if they were ever loaded in the first place, gave them to the men, and then had them walk out?

            Because the IDF are really fucking stupid if it’s the former.

            • Remmock
              link
              fedilink
              01 year ago

              While I generally agree with you, I do need to point out that those rifles are unloaded and it is common for enemy combatants to be forced to carry their non-combat-functional equipment this way as a method of capturing equipment.

            • @[email protected]OP
              link
              fedilink
              -71 year ago

              I’m no professional militant and I wasn’t there, so I have no comment.

              If you can prove otherwise relating to this article, with a reliable source, the facts remains as stated in the article.

              • Flying Squid
                link
                131 year ago

                It’s not my job to prove the article is wrong. The article makes the claim and fails to prove the claim. I do not have to prove anyone is telling a lie. It’s not my job.

                Anyway, I never said the article was wrong. I asked questions- questions you have not even attempted to answer.

          • @LotrOrc
            link
            81 year ago

            There was literally an article three days ago on the BBC that showed that the IDF did exactly that.

            The IDF has been lying this entire time - a bunch of the casualties from the October 7th attack were caused by the IDF themselves.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              51 year ago

              There was literally an article three days ago on the BBC that showed that the IDF did exactly that.

              To which article are you referring?

            • Fitik
              link
              fedilink
              31 year ago

              a bunch of the casualties from the October 7th attack were caused by the IDF themselves.

              They weren’t, it’s a conspiracy theory

            • @MeanEYE
              link
              31 year ago

              Oh, so these people speaking arabic cutting the womb of the mother and stabbing the baby while it’s still alive are also IDF. Who would have thought. Good thing you straightened that up for all of us. It seems Israel really had to come up with a reason to go against Hamas, since the rest of the claims are fake.

            • @[email protected]OP
              link
              fedilink
              -31 year ago

              I wrote:

              until you prove this statement regarding this article

              You wrote:

              There was literally an article three days ago on the BBC that showed that the IDF did exactly that

              This is not relevant for this article, so currently there is no proof regarding this article.

              The IDF has been lying this entire time

              False statement.

              • a bunch of the casualties from the October 7th attack were caused by the IDF themselves.

              This is not relevant for this article, so currently there is no proof regarding this article.

  • stopthatgirl7
    link
    fedilink
    151 year ago

    Yeah, I trust this about as much as I trust the story that Hamas was storing guns and grenades in the same room as an MRI machine.

    • @n3m37h
      link
      -11 year ago

      You know MRI machines are only magnetic when they are turned on?

      • Remmock
        link
        fedilink
        91 year ago

        In any hospital an MRI machine is used all day. Any hospital comes as close to using every piece of equipment constantly as often as it can, even overbooking patients before being willing to invest in an additional piece of equipment.

        Do you believe that MRI sat idle for months so they could stockpile weapons? Did the hospital as a whole agree to store weapons instead of accepting the sick?

        Would you casually allow any local terrorist cell to stockpile weapons in a room at your place of work without saying something? Even if you would, would every single coworker do the same?

        Almost any specialty in a hospital may have a reason to recommend an MRI, so it’s not like this would be a closely guarded secret. The entire hospital would know fairly quickly that the room is unavailable. What any practical person knows that any conspiracy theorist overlooks is how hard it is to keep a lid on a secret, especially as you keep adding people. Hell, they couldn’t even keep a lid on GTA VI.

        • @n3m37h
          link
          31 year ago

          Have you ever heard of the Manhattan Project? Where they built 2 small cities and an incoming President was kept in the dark on the project for years…

          I’m not saying it happened or not. I’m just saying it is a possibility it happened. I have 0 clue either way

          • FaceDeer
            link
            fedilink
            31 year ago

            It seems unlikely to me that Hamas would have deployed Manhattan-Project-level counterintelligence work so that they could hide some guns in an MRI machine’s room, instead of maybe just stashing them in a broom closet down the hall.

            It’s possible, sure. But this is my opinion on its likelihood and that sounds reasonably grounded to me.

            An alternative explanation that seems more likely to me is that the IDF really wanted to be able to publish some photos that indicated that Hamas was using hospitals as armories, and so they propped some guns up next to a highly recognizable piece of medical equipment found only in hospitals so they could get those photos. Maybe the guns were taken from the broom closet down the hall, maybe they weren’t, I don’t have any basis for an opinion on that part. The rest seems most plausible to me in the meantime.

        • DarkGamer
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          You’re presuming that the weapons got stashed there while it was still in use, which has not been established. The weapons were in a bag behind the MRI machine, not in it. Here’s the video.

          • Remmock
            link
            fedilink
            3
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Yeah, you really got me there. There’s no way things would have been able to react to the MRI machine because they’re in a goddamn bag.

            If you don’t understand science that’s fine, but please show your way out of the conversation and let people who want to have an actual discussion participate.

            • DarkGamer
              link
              fedilink
              1
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Care to explain to me why the metal objects they are rifling through the bag aren’t flying into the MRI machine then?

              Turning off the Magnet
              Is the magnetic field turned on and off between patients?
              Resistive electromagnet scanners, in theory, can be turned on and off. However, it may take 30-60 minutes for their magnetic fields to stabilize after being off and hence they are generally left continuously on during daily operations. To save electricity, they are usually turned off or have their power levels reduced after hours.
              https://mriquestions.com/is-field-ever-turned-off.html

              If you don’t understand how MRI machines work that’s fine, but please show your way out of the conversation and let people who want to have an actual discussion participate.

              • Remmock
                link
                fedilink
                31 year ago

                Um. You proved me right and have therefore suggested for me that this was staged. Congratulations?

                The MRI magnet is ALWAYS on. This means no person is allowed to enter the MRI scan room without clearance and permission from a certified technologist. Metallic objects (such as fingernail clippers, pocket knives and even pens) can lead to serious bodily injury if brought within the magnetic field.

                Source: https://medicine.uiowa.edu/mri/mri-safety-basics

                • DarkGamer
                  link
                  fedilink
                  1
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Lol, you linked a different hospital’s rules regarding MRIs, which are that way because under normal circumstances it never shuts off. I linked you a page that shows that there are three types of MRIs, and one of them can in fact turn off its magnetic field. Now, I haven’t established if that’s the kind that they use in Al-Shifa, but it’s quite possible. At very least the fact that it’s off means there is no moving magnetic field and depending on where the magnet is, it may be totally possible to stash a bag there without negative consequences. Different machines use different magnetic strengths. The fact that the metal items in the bag aren’t being affected makes your theory not very compelling and seems to be proof that this is possible.

      • stopthatgirl7
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Do you know MRI machines are used constantly and so they’d have to keep moving the guns and grenades in and out of the room all day every day? It literally makes zero sense logistically to store them there because you can’t LEAVE them there.

    • LinkOpensChest.wav
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      They can also force confessions of terrorism! Pretty bold headline that’s parroting IDF propaganda, if you ask me. Wouldn’t say this article belongs in a news community.

      • be_excellent_to_each_other
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        You could very well be right, but even if true it gives the lie to weeks of their excuses for how they have handled this so far.

          • @[email protected]OP
            link
            fedilink
            -2
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Who will save the Palestinian population from Hamas, that setup military cells in civil buildings, schools and hospitals?

            Did anyone tried to save them?

            Did anyone succeed saving them?

            By the current ongoing IDF revelations, since Israel disengaged from Gaza (2005) as an attempt to give Palestinians independence, there was ongoing terror prosper, not Palestinians prosper, but terror prosper.

      • DarkGamer
        link
        fedilink
        01 year ago

        Funny how the anti-Israel crowd moves the goal posts from there is no evidence to, this is IDF propaganda and can’t be trusted. I guess the footage they released of Hamas tunnels was also faked? The footage of belligerents shooting from the hospital too?

        • athos77
          link
          fedilink
          41 year ago

          On one of those videos that the Israeli soldiers filmed themselves and then posted (because they don’t think they’ve done anything wrong), there’s one where they’re singing a song about attacking their enemies and one of the lyrics was something to the effect of “there are no civilians” among the Palestinians.

          Of course, if the Israelis think that there are no Palestinian civilians, that means that every Palestinian is an enemy soldier, and therefore a legitimate target. :/

        • LinkOpensChest.wav
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          It’s true that I don’t trust the IDF here, just as I wouldn’t trust the SS in WWII. If you think that’s farfetched, then I will hope you come to your senses.

            • Froyn
              link
              fedilink
              41 year ago

              IDF slogan “Hamas was all the bodies we created along the way”

            • LinkOpensChest.wav
              link
              fedilink
              3
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Lol gotta love these deflections and whataboutisms. I always wonder if you lot are deliberately deflecting, or if you’re just incapable of engaging in any meaningful way.

              • MxM111
                link
                fedilink
                11 year ago

                It is a valid question if you do not trust IDF as source of information. It is not diversion tactics.

                • LinkOpensChest.wav
                  link
                  fedilink
                  11 year ago

                  Incorrect. I challenge you to scour my post and comment history for any mention of Hamas or anything that would justify you asking such a question. (I’ll save you some time – you won’t find it.)

                  Otherwise, we’ll just assume you’re deflecting.

        • NoIWontPickaName
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          Can you show me 40 decapitated babies?

          I will start to consider trusting them after that.

            • NoIWontPickaName
              link
              fedilink
              01 year ago

              The point was that the IDF made a big deal in the opening days about how they had found forty decapitated babies, and used that as proof of how bad Hamas was.

              That was the one where they went too far and everybody started wanting proof of so outlandish a claim.

              I really wish I could find the video where the IDF guy say something like” we know we have lied in the past but this time it is different.”

              Those babies are where people started doubting them and looking at everything so clearly

              • @[email protected]OP
                link
                fedilink
                -2
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                It isn’t related to this article.

                The article state facts, and they’ll remain facts until otherwise proofed regarding this article.

      • @[email protected]OP
        link
        fedilink
        -4
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        You are being wrong saying it’s a propaganda because this is not a lie. It’s an official report from within Gaza.

        • LinkOpensChest.wav
          link
          fedilink
          31 year ago

          I have no doubt there are official confessions obtained via coercion including threats and possible torture.

          • @[email protected]OP
            link
            fedilink
            -31 year ago

            I do have a doubt, because there is no proof it happened.

            However, there is a proof that weapons were found next to baby incubators.

            After Hamas killed more than 100 babies with their own hands, I actually won’t have a doubt they’ll put weapons next to these babies.

            You can have doubt, you can not believe it, it’s ok, but facts are facts.

            Hamas is brutal and bad for the Palestinians, prove me otherwise.

    • DarkGamer
      link
      fedilink
      -1
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Those soldiers went in after the bombings. You’re inaccurately implying that they should have gone in without air support, which would have caused massive casualties to their side.

      • Flying Squid
        link
        61 year ago

        which would have caused massive casualties to their side.

        And those are the only casualties that matter!

        • DarkGamer
          link
          fedilink
          -2
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          In war, yes, it should be unsurprising that one’s own forces are considered more important to protect than enemy forces, or civilians from a hostile nation.

            • DarkGamer
              link
              fedilink
              0
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I edited my comment to be more clear and concise, but you replied too soon, I had a feeling you’d interpret that phrase in the least charitable way possible.

              Civilians from a hostile nation is more accurate, although widespread public support of intifada doesn’t mean you’re entirely wrong. Despite this, israel is still choosing military targets, unlike their opponent.

              • Flying Squid
                link
                51 year ago

                How exactly should have I interpreted the phrase “enemy civilians?” What is the charitable interpretation of that phrase?

                • DarkGamer
                  link
                  fedilink
                  -1
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Civilians from an enemy nation that’s at war with yours

              • athos77
                link
                fedilink
                11 year ago

                Ah, I see, you’re likely one of those singing that song. :(