• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    661 year ago
    • Told family that person in custody died in a car crash
    • Officer tells media that person in custody was brutally beaten to death and it was on camera
    • They serve Google a warrant to find out who it was
    • Fire whistleblower
    • Offer whistleblower $200k to go silent and he refuses
    • Whistleblower still wants system fixed
    • Alto
      link
      fedilink
      641 year ago

      This is it. This is the mystical “good cop”. And that’s how the rest of the pigs treat them.

      ACAB

      • Doug HollandOP
        link
        English
        161 year ago

        It’s what happens, every time.

        • Alto
          link
          fedilink
          20
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Now now, dont be reductive. Sometimes they straight up execute them in a “training accident” instead

          • Doug HollandOP
            link
            English
            41 year ago

            Yeah, I stand corrected, thanks.

        • @arin
          link
          English
          271 year ago

          He’s not, that’s why he’s not a cop anymore

            • @GeneralVincent
              link
              English
              301 year ago

              ACAB means that all cops are bastards. And if one isn’t a bastard yet, they will become a bastard or be kicked out/killed by the bastards.

              It doesn’t mean cops can’t do good things or that a good person can’t become a cop. It just means all cops inherently and inevitably participate in a broken system and those that try to fix it will end up being targeted.

              We can have a nuanced take while saying ACAB.

              • HeartyBeast
                link
                fedilink
                -131 year ago

                We can have a nuanced take while saying ACAB.

                It’s a phrase that explicitly denies any possibility of a nuanced take, or any possibility of reform or anyone good attempting to change the system from the inside. It indiscriminately labels everyone who takes a job to enforce laws globally. It’s crass and I hate it. And no, I’m not a cop

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  91 year ago

                  It also says you can’t change the system from inside. This article is about that. I think that’s proven by themselves.

                • @GeneralVincent
                  link
                  English
                  41 year ago

                  I see it explicitly as a call to reform. If all cops are bastards, the only way to not have bastards as cops is reform. And if the reform works, the phrase dies.

                  I agree it’s a combative phrase, but that’s part of the point. It’s a call to action

            • Alto
              link
              fedilink
              141 year ago

              Sorry, would “99.9% of cops are bastards and because of reactions like this the tiny fraction that aren’t are entirely irrelevant” be better? It’s a bit of a mouthful.

              ACAB

              • HeartyBeast
                link
                fedilink
                -111 year ago

                Yes it would be better, because it would at least require people to think. But hey, if nuance gets in the way of a good slogan, we should jettison it in favour of simplicity.

                • Alto
                  link
                  fedilink
                  9
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  They mean the same thing honey. The tiny portion that are “good cops” are unfortunately 100% irrelevant because of shit like this. If they’re not able to actually cause change, which they are not, whether or not they exist doesn’t matter because they may as well not.

                  You’re being intentionally dense. You know it. I know it. Everybody here knows it.

  • gullible
    link
    fedilink
    71 year ago

    Police are a fantastic source of visible small-scale implementations of regulatory capture. It’d be an exciting revelation if it weren’t quite so horrifying. A few bad apples spoil the bunch.