• @shinjiikarus
    link
    English
    111 year ago

    Genuine questions: what are your fears about these definitions? Are the mlem developers using community contributions unfairly and gaining money off of other people‘s work under that license? Is the current definition worse than Apollo + Reddit (both proprietary as far as I know) for the consumer?

    • @Zeth0s
      link
      English
      21 year ago

      It anyway doesn’t claim license is not “open source”, just not free. That is very different. Source is open, cannot be freely utilized

      • afoutopatisa
        link
        English
        11 year ago

        That is correct. I’m OK with them using “open source” as it’s valid.

  • Kintsugi
    link
    English
    11 year ago

    deleted by creator