Which also happens to be the middle eastern hemisphere countries.

Everyone of the Stan countries are 60E+.

I call out bullshit when I see it. I don’t have feelings for trolls.

Toilet paper doesn’t have a fun name.

You made a claim and then have nothing to back it up.

Did I ask for one?

Then what views to you have that you would call centrist?

Yes, literally in the post you responded to where you gave empty platitudes. I didn’t go straight to assumptions. I asked a question and you skirted around it like in every other response in here.

Suspicion culture is something you just made up. You make a claim, I asked for details around it, and you deflected. Yea, people are going to be suspicious when someone comes off as trolling and won’t support their claims with specifics.

Europe is only in the middle because that’s where the prime meridian is at. Everyone uses the same longitude and latitude and the hemispheres are the same for everyone. It’s definitely in the middle third of the Eastern hemisphere.

The counteies like Iraq, Iran, and the Stans are just west of 90E. They could be considered West Middle East, but they’re closer to the middle than either edge of the hemisphere.

The terms near east, middle east, and far east are labeled as such because of their position relative to the prime meridian, which runs through Europe.

The prime meridian runs through western Europe. Most of Europe would be in the near East, relative to that point. China is on the far east of the hemisphere. They are fair labels based on their position to the prime meridian.

You can’t even provide a single example.

It’s East of the prime meridian and it’s in the middle of the Eastern hemisphere. It is strictly defined by geography.

The Middle East is in the middle of the Eastern hemisphere.

Then what views to you have that you would call centrist?

I can’t tell you what’s a better place for this, but it’s not here.

I don’t have the answer to that. You could post that question in NoStupidQuestions and probably get some answers.

Quitting cold turkey is tough. What worked for me was switching to a vape and gradually reducing the nicotine level. Getting a quality vape that you can refill and replace the coils will probably be more effective than the cheap disposable ones. I found it fun to try different tips, rebuilding them, and making my own coils. I probably only had a single bottle of 0 nicotine when it was clear that I was just wasting money. I don’t think I’ve had a cigarette since, but I do have an occasional social cigar.

My brother quit over a year ago and he uses nicotine pouches, like Zyn, but there are lots of different brands and flavours. Those also have varying levels of nicotine if you are looking to fully ween yourself off. A bonus of the pouches is that they are inconspicuous, don’t stink, and unlike tobacco, it’s only nicotine, which isn’t particularly good for you, but it’s not carcinogenic like chewing tobacco or inhaling anything. They’re still relatively new, so there aren’t long term studies, but it’s certainly less bad than tobacco.

Taco created the pee bib in The League. Great show.

That’s still not doing what the rule says. It’s not about sourcing the contents of your post. The entire post should be a link to a specific politics related article where the title of the post is the title of the article.

Everything can be political when broken down, but this isn’t the community for this type of post. I can’t tell you what’s a better place for this, but it’s not here.

A year or two ago, I was having a wee and was thinking about how women dry with TP and us men are just degenerates that shake it around. I jokingly thought about creating a “wankerchief” that guys could keep around and calling it a “Peter Patter”.

It definitely made me giggle far too much. It’s a disgusting premise to carry around a piss covered rag, but the names I thought were on point.

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

This post breaks rule 1 of Politics. All posts must be a link to an article. This isn’t that nor is it politics related.