Seems like the exact oposite thing they should do. If they actually want drivers to slow down and obey the limit they can’t back down. A middle ground option could be offering each vehicle 1 freebie each time camera locations are changed, but regardless, if the camera ticketed you, you were speeding and were breaking the rules. They should be thankful its just an ASE ticket and not a ticket from a cop that comes with higher fines and insurance complications.
It could be either. The schwarts awakens is a reference to the force awakens and could be a fitting although disappointing title if the film is going to parody the newer stuff from star wars.
The people of Ontario love flying their fuck Trudeau/Carney flags and blaming the feds for problems their provincial government is responsible for and won’t solve.
The announcement implies it is titled “the schwartz awakens”
They had the opportunity to name it “spaceballs 2, the search for more money” as referenced in the original, but they blew it.
One could argue it is safe in reasonable moderation. CHS devlops due to extreme and excessive daily use of cannabis. Enjoying a joint every now and then is far safer than toking every 30 minutes.
If i ate 30 chocolate bars everyday for weeks on end, I’d have some serious health issues, but one every weekend would be nearly unnoticeable from a health perspective.
I was also thinking strapped to the ceiling would be the safest
It is, but horni brain isn’t thinking about future sleepy brain, horni brain wants the wet and wants it now, no time for towel.
Then people see this and go “see no one uses the train so why should my tax dollars go to fund it”
Imagine if we let drivers have 1 day per week to use the highway, suddenly they might not think their taxs are worth it for the service they are getting.
Everything is driving distance and simultaneously, America is “too big” for high speed rail
Honestly if anything is surprising its that its only double and not more
If i worked 13/52 weeks, I would no longer have my job. How the hell did Ontario pick this oaf for a third time?
“Oh people are protesting my law that denies their rights and destroys their lands, better go off to the cottage all summer until this blows over”. Is this really the attitude we want from a leader?
Given they are suspended over water, it may actually be better to not have the harness. If the whole thing were to tip the harness could get tangled and keep someone trapped under water.
Road budgets and projects go way over all the time and the vast majority of those projects still go through.
His excuses for what is causing congestion are statistically wrong, he blames the solutions to congestion as the causes.
The province has hinted at planing some other transit projects so lets cancel new projects that would work better in unison.
He explicitly states that new solutions cannot slow down private automobiles, despite them be unfairly catered to for decades while every other transportation method is left underfunded, unreliable, and is already much slower than private automobiles.
He then has the audacity to claim this will lead to amore inclusive solution when he is explicitly excluding cyclists from safe infrastructure.
Flaring is much better than just letting the methane escape so it would be a better solution than doing nothing and would be a great stepping stone to a more permanent option. Flaring would be much cheaper than a methane generator or capture device.
If only those companies were wealthy enough to do something about it. I guess our only choice is let the tazpayer handle it.
But public transport is COMMUNISM. Someone needs to be profiting!
What the hell is up with your trains where it takes 55 minutes to go 20kms?
Bikes do not contribute to congestion and most places actually experience less congestion when a bike lane is built (cause thats 1 less person that needs to be in a car). I’m so sick of the “we can’t build bike lanes, transit, sidewalks etc because it causes congestion” excuse.
These cameras are often installed in areas with heavy pedestrian traffic and a history of injury. I don’t really think shrugging it off as people speed is a good attitude towards public safety. Personally i think making the roads naturally safer through physical traffic calming like lane narrowing would be a better option, but its a significantly more expensive option.