Afaik native speakers make such mistakes more often, since they learned far more of the language by hearing than by reading

That’s a nice fucken kitty right there

You know when children keep their fingers like half a centimeter away from someone and go “why are you getting annoyed? I’m not touching you!”

That’s him.

The trick is having a decoy keyboard!

Why dignify such obvious lies with a reaction 😒

yeah, that works nicely

All references online also seem to point to it being the contraceptive pill: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antibabypille

I’ve always heard that for the normal pill, not the morning-after one.

But I don’t wanna ascend yet. Give me a couple more decades.

You did a great job! It has a distinct visual style which I really like.

And he has to carry the guy who’s supposedly doing all the work

I’m not sure I agree. Just like Motion Blur, DoF is a real phenomenon, and we notice when it’s absent. There are lots of good artistic reasons to use it.

But just like Motion Blur, it’s really hard and costly to implement properly. Unless you have close-to-perfect eye tracking, it will be annoying because of what you describe. So until we’ve got that working well, having no DoF is much better.

Not in the same way. Our eyes have lower resolution away from the center, but that’s not what’s causing DoF effects. You’re still missing the actual DoF.

If the effect was only caused by your eye, the depth wouldn’t matter, but it clearly does.

No, your eyes can’t do it on a screen. The effect is physically caused by the different distances of two objects, but the screen is always the same distance from you.

Just have to be careful not to scrape the pan if it’s non-stick

(pssht, don’t tell them)

SAAAVE ME!

If he didn’t earn his place in Elysium, I’ll kill everyone in Valhalla and then myself