The countries look darker but if you mark a western country, the shown numbers are slightly bigger than 60%.
If a country has 66% of GDP in form of wages, and you increase the wages by 50%, you need 33% of the GDP which leads to 99% of the GDP being used for wages. Obviously there can’t be more.
If only Musk would use LSD or whichever drug helps to resolve those issues instead of ketamine.
https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/labor-share-of-gdp
60% of GDP are wages. People can earn 50% more if all profits would be handed out as wages.
What good are blind signatures if the users of IP addresses are known? The bigger problem is that the state can block access to social networks for individual citizens.
You will get that war. The USA and China will clash and the EU is preparing to take care of Russia when that war starts.
That’s what makes OP’s question interesting.
Heatpumps in front of houses.
For those attacks the size doesn’t matter but the willingness of breaking the law. My size argument is that the USA and China will clash. Europe will engage Russia when that happens.
Thank you for your insightful feedback. Have a great WE, too.
Voter and voted are not the same.
It shows that the ones who are so against women, gay, drag, trans were easily distracted by superficial showmanship. It’s actually sad that they can’t perceive inner values.
When all you have is two hammers, one of them starts to look like a nail.
Insightful
So you’re genuinely advocating breaking international law?
No, I just believe that the EU will break the law and attack, like members already did in Libya and Iraq.
I can also say that I was not the one talking about fantasies.
Edit and yes, there is a need to wait for Ukraine EU membership
Is there a reason for that? UN article 51 seems to allow support of other countries if they are attacked.
Too simple for an explanation, they are not stupid.
Ukraine soldiers are trained for 3 months. There can’t be much infrastructure needed for an attack since the battle is on enemy territory when it starts.
Also, surely you’re aware that wars of aggression are banned in international law?
Iraq, Libya and others. At worst we call it a special military operation in support of Ukraine.
That’s why we need to get Ukraine to the EU, so that then it’s not a war of aggression, but honoring the mutual defense clause.
I guess there is no need to wait for EU membership to help a country in need.
Oh and, in which country’s military forces would you be participating in this attack fantasy?
None. After these comments at most they will use me for medical support.
So the laws won’t protect the children. Then why do those laws exist?
That’s why the new weapons are needed, to prepare for an attack.
Why else would Europe need those weapons? Russia has problems fighting Ukraine. How could they fight Europe?
Btw, I say we because any serious war will use the entire population, like Ukraine.
A European attack is prevented by critical voices from within Europe. If those voices are removed we will attack despite the threat of nuclear bombs.
By presenting an arbitrary other motivation, which implies that there is no obvious motivation.
Yet why does my reasoning not make sense? We fought in Libya. Everybody hates Russia and would be eager to fight if Russia didn’t have nuclear bombs. Remove the critical voices and we are ready to go.
It could be. So you agree that the surveillance laws don’t make much sense?
Are people that stupid to overvalue Tesla that much for years or is somebody stabilizing the market rate? Somebody is playing 5D chess but it is not Musk.
Nun, wie mit dem am Anfang angesprochenen Abtrainieren von Gemeinschaft und Vertrauen umgehen?