Trump’s unprovoked disaster war that no allies want to touch with a ten foot pole is bad for China?
Coming from US-headquartered The Atlantic this feels like someone throwing stones from a glass house. Maybe they have some weight to their argument… I’ll keep reading… OK I’m at the end now, nothing substantial really.
Perhaps Xi expects that an America divided at home and extended abroad will eventually recede, like history’s other overstretched empires. But patience can slip into complacency, and Xi’s reluctance to offer more than lip service and trade deals to allies may prove that China isn’t a suitable alternative to America’s global leadership.
Ok, so definitely no then.
China’s modern diplomacy is renowned for its patience and medium to long-term goals. This article is pure copium hoping to balloon-animal this fresh disaster for the US (in a long succession of disasters) into some kind of accidental win.
No, if your president throws troops onto a landmine and some blood spatters onto a neighboring enemy, that is not somehow a partial victory.























Y tho. What in fuck does a payment provider have to do with asking for this?