

Nominative determinism at Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
Nominative determinism at Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
Yes because you’re clearly projecting some feelings onto the guy you banned they clearly didn’t exhibit.
If you can’t be impartial in moderation, I suggest maybe taking a step back!
OP literally mentions they’re in Florida
Except this is not the first time this sort of thing has been proposed.
password managers save my life very hard
okay so where do these things actually work?
Because 9/10 times they are awful, expensive, unused, and quickly shut down.
You don’t see any of these niche techslop pods operating anywhere you actually go, because they don’t work.
I think there may be a slight difference between doing heroin and playing a video game where you get anime girls by chance.
Wafern would probably roll off the tongue a little better?
Bro is straight up divining in here.
What do the tea leaves say.
Eh, I do think it is annoying when people make those kinds of comments, it’s usually weed guys too.
I am not hostile to you, just the toxic sentiment you carry.
Yea fair I guess I’m tired
Could also just be a non native English speaker.
You may have misunderstood my propensity to dream, frolic, and play as hostility.
I will blink as many times as it is required for you to understand my sense of wonder is much stronger than weed.
Brother thinks I need substances to be whimsical
We should travel back in time to stop Kinoko Nasu from creating Fate
I was considering just not replying to this but I decided that this mindset makes me too sad.
If an artist decides to include something in their work, it is likely going to be relevant in some way.
To use the stupid meme example of “the curtains were fucking blue” your teacher wasn’t telling you that blue curtains = sadness, they were telling you to think critically about what the writer chose to include in the text.
“The curtains were fucking blue” can be a valid interpretation, but the issue is when people stop their thinking at that surface level and ridicule any deeper analysis of a work.
You’re trying too hard