Chinese police hunting international corruption targets were allowed into Australia by the federal police and subsequently escorted a woman back to China for trial, in a major breach of Chinese-Australian police protocols.

The revelations, contained in Monday night’s Four Corners program about a former Chinese spy, prompted a sharp rebuke from federal politicians who are concerned the act may have undermined Australia’s national security.

The Chinese police were permitted to enter Australia in 2019 to talk with a 59-year-old Chinese-born Australian resident.

The woman was targeted under a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) anti-corruption drive called Operation Fox Hunt, which relies on police from the Ministry of Public Security (MPS) to make arrests.

Her case is one of 283 cases documented by an international NGO, Safeguard Defenders, in its recent report, Chasing Fox Hunt.

While Fox Hunt is described by the CCP as targeting “economic criminals”, human rights groups have said it is also used to silence dissidents and abduct people around the world.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -35
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Explain why you think my theory of the world running on money is far from the truth.

    • @Nurse_Robot
      link
      English
      42
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      It’s far from the truth to assume there’s one cohesive government entity that collaborates and communicates well enough to do something like this, and to assume not a single person associated has decided to be a whistle blower.

      Edit: a word

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -287 months ago

        Not the same commenter but still, nevertheless, interested in the convo ofc

        It may not be an explicit government, but that’s why I specifically said in my retort “the world runs on money”.

        • @Nurse_Robot
          link
          English
          167 months ago

          Are you speaking about yourself? Because you absolutely are the same commenter.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            147 months ago

            They are talking about you. Their first reply was to someone else but the second was for you.

            • @Nurse_Robot
              link
              English
              87 months ago

              That was a very unconventional way of phrasing that.

              • @TrickDacy
                link
                English
                -7
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                And yet extremely easy to understand especially when you’re the one who butted in randomly

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  67 months ago

                  Is joining a comment section considered butting in randomly? What is the point of Lemmy if joining a comment thread is viewed negatively?

                  • @TrickDacy
                    link
                    English
                    -97 months ago

                    Doing this is only negative if you’re a jerk about it, which they were

          • @rockSlayer
            link
            English
            127 months ago

            They forgot to switch to their alt lmao

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -197 months ago

            … so either you’re on alts or have such a lack of self awareness that you don’t even recognize what you did.

            Either way I think we’re done here lol

            • @Nurse_Robot
              link
              English
              107 months ago

              Again, are you speaking about yourself? You’re the original commenter, not me.

        • @unreasonabro
          link
          English
          17 months ago

          the level of reading comprehension, the number of assumptions kids make these days - its fucking horrifying, innit

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -17 months ago

            Not at all, some concepts are harder for some. Some grow up in environments that make learning ugly, alienating, etc. I do want to ask - would you catch flies better with vinegar or with honey? Or are you more interested in squashing?